Reduce malloc churn for console calls <=128KiB #18287
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zadjii-msft
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
DHowett
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
DHowett
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2025
This increases the console IO buffer size to retain at least 128KiB as this matches the default buffer size of `cat`. This avoids allocator churn due to constantly freeing and reallocating buffers. In the future this should ideally use a better suited, cheap allocator. Closes #18286 (cherry picked from commit aa5459d) Service-Card-Id: PVTI_lADOAF3p4s4AmhmQzgWLtjY Service-Version: 1.22
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This increases the console IO buffer size to retain at least 128KiB as this matches the default buffer size of
cat. This avoids allocator churn due to constantly freeing and reallocating buffers. In the future this should ideally use a better suited, cheap allocator.Closes #18286