Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark spec files as archived #40373

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2020
Merged

Mark spec files as archived #40373

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2020

Conversation

sandersn
Copy link
Member

@sandersn sandersn commented Sep 3, 2020

Maybe then people won't try to edit them and submit PRs

Maybe then people won't try to edit them and submit PRs
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Author: Team For Uncommitted Bug PR for untriaged, rejected, closed or missing bug labels Sep 3, 2020
@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

DanielRosenwasser commented Sep 3, 2020

Please add a README.md

# Archived Spec

NOTE: the files in this directory are NOT meant to be edited. They are a snapshot of the out-of-date specification which is no longer being updated. We will not be accepting changes to these documents.

@sandersn
Copy link
Member Author

sandersn commented Sep 4, 2020

There's already a README! I know, I'm surprised too. Anyway, I replaced the "here's how to contribute" text with your new "please do not contribute" text.

@sandersn sandersn merged commit 30cb204 into master Sep 4, 2020
@sandersn sandersn deleted the mark-spec-files-as-archived branch September 4, 2020 15:17
@j-oliveras
Copy link
Contributor

You can configure the bot to reject PRs on that files.

@EoinDavey
Copy link

I think that this change has broken the links to the spec in the main repo README.md, as those links depend on the filenames

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Author: Team For Uncommitted Bug PR for untriaged, rejected, closed or missing bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants