-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various cleanups: Impl and wrapper functions for vector algorithms #4146
Merged
StephanTLavavej
merged 2 commits into
microsoft:main
from
StephanTLavavej:cleanup-vector-algorithms
Nov 7, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ const void* __stdcall __std_max_element_4(const void* _First, const void* _Last, | |
const void* __stdcall __std_max_element_8(const void* _First, const void* _Last, bool _Signed) noexcept; | ||
_END_EXTERN_C | ||
|
||
_STD_BEGIN | ||
template <class _Ty, class _TVal> | ||
__declspec(noalias) size_t __std_count_trivial(_Ty* _First, _Ty* _Last, const _TVal _Val) noexcept { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ditto |
||
if constexpr (_STD is_pointer_v<_TVal> || _STD is_null_pointer_v<_TVal>) { | ||
|
@@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ _Ty* __std_max_element(_Ty* _First, _Ty* _Last) noexcept { | |
static_assert(_STD _Always_false<_Ty>, "Unexpected size"); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
_STD_END | ||
|
||
#endif // _USE_STD_VECTOR_ALGORITHMS | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we remove
_std_
from these function names - possibly in a followup - to avoid the awkward_STD __std
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea is that they behave just like the
__std_meow_N
functions without theN
size; renaming them would break that symmetry. That said I wouldn't grumble too much, as long as the names are unique.(If I had my way there wouldn't be any
_STD
at all and we wouldn't care about the incomplete type scenario 😹)