Bug: Updating typing of playSegments method

[brandondv]

The typing of playSegments is slightly off currently. So hereby a small PR to fix that :)

• expected usage according to docs: [1, 10] / [[1, 10]] / [[1, 10], [11, 20], ... ]
• actual usage according to typings: [[1, 10], [11, 20]] / [[1, 10]]

Both types work and are correct according to https://github.com/airbnb/lottie-web/blob/0d658b34c40d4e81eafdccbf698815346454a899/index.d.ts#L91

Summary by Sourcery

Update the typing of the playSegments method to align with expected usage, allowing it to accept either a single AnimationSegment or an array of AnimationSegments.

Enhancements:

• Update the typing of the playSegments method to accept both a single AnimationSegment and an array of AnimationSegments.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
vue3-lottie	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Aug 16, 2024 3:45pm

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the typing of the playSegments method in the vue3-lottie component. The change modifies the type definition of the segments parameter to allow for more flexible input, aligning it with the expected usage according to the documentation and the actual implementation in the lottie-web library.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
packages/vue3-lottie/src/vue3-lottie.vue	Updated the type definition of the segments parameter in the playSegments method from AnimationSegment[] to `AnimationSegment

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @brandondv - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[megasanjay]

Thank you for the PR. Will release soon