adding mphys wrapper

[anilyil]

Purpose

This PR adds the MPhys wrapper for DVGeo. See the discussion of a similar PR in ADflow: mdolab/adflow#196

Expected time until merged

Type of change

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (non-backwards-compatible fix or feature)
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
• Documentation update
• Maintenance update
• Other (please describe)

Testing

Checklist

• I have run flake8 and black to make sure the code adheres to PEP-8 and is consistently formatted
• I have run unit and regression tests which pass locally with my changes
• I have added new tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #120 (cfb57d6) into main (bf9b4eb) will decrease coverage by 11.79%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #120       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   63.40%   51.60%   -11.80%     
===========================================
  Files          41       43        +2     
  Lines       11033    11182      +149     
===========================================
- Hits         6995     5771     -1224     
- Misses       4038     5411     +1373     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pygeo/mphys/__init__.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pygeo/mphys/mphys_dvgeo.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pygeo/parameterization/DVGeoMulti.py	0.40% <0.00%> (-89.42%)	⬇️
pygeo/constraints/areaConstraint.py	50.50% <0.00%> (-25.42%)	⬇️
pygeo/constraints/DVCon.py	66.56% <0.00%> (-3.80%)	⬇️
pygeo/pyBlock.py	45.37% <0.00%> (-1.65%)	⬇️
pygeo/parameterization/DVGeo.py	63.79% <0.00%> (-0.50%)	⬇️
pygeo/topology.py	54.92% <0.00%> (-0.23%)	⬇️
pygeo/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (+10.52%)	⬆️
pygeo/parameterization/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (+14.28%)	⬆️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[joanibal]

Don't forget to fix linting error

[anilyil]

If this looks good can someone merge this? I guess I cannot merge myself because I am not a maintainer here? I will add tests and clean the implementation a bit in future PRs.