Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor StripInhoms #121

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Refactor StripInhoms #121

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

dbrakenhoff
Copy link
Collaborator

@dbrakenhoff dbrakenhoff commented Dec 17, 2024

Apply changes from TTim Xsections to TimML to keep the two as similar as possible:

  • rename to Xsection, XsectionMaq, Xsection3D
  • add ModelXsection for cross-section models
  • rename StripAreaSink to XsectionAreaSink
  • add SimpleAquifer for cross-section models
  • fix imports update examples
  • update docs
  • deprecation warnings for old object names

- rename to Xsection, XsectionMaq, Xsection3D
- add ModelXsection for cross-section models
- rename StripAreaSink to XsectionAreaSink
- add SimpleAquifer for cross-section models
- fix imports
update examples
- update docs
- deprecation warnings for old object names
@mbakker7
Copy link
Owner

mbakker7 commented Dec 20, 2024

Looks good. One question: I thought there used to be a notebook where a StripAreaSink was compared to an inhomogeneity with recharge. They should give the same results. I cannot find that back. Where did we put that? And do we want to keep StripAreaSink alive for the same reasons it was only implemented as an inhom with recharge in TTim?
My suggestion: deprecate StripAreaSink but keep it for backwards compatibility and testing.

- label section comparing areasink to inhom areasink solutions.
- add deprecation warning that XsectionAreaSink is for testing purposes only.
@dbrakenhoff dbrakenhoff merged commit 85b0f1e into dev Dec 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@dbrakenhoff dbrakenhoff deleted the xsection_refactor branch December 20, 2024 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants