Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#2821] Implement provisional configuration for OpenKlant2 service #1452

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pi-sigma
Copy link
Contributor

@pi-sigma pi-sigma commented Oct 18, 2024

The PR adds a provisional configuration for the OpenKlant2 service + tests so we can start integrating OpenKlant2 into our code. To be replaced with a proper configuration model.

Taiga: https://taiga.maykinmedia.nl/project/open-inwoner/task/2821

@pi-sigma pi-sigma changed the title [#2821] Implement provisionary configuration for OpenKlant2 service [#2821] Implement provisional configuration for OpenKlant2 service Oct 18, 2024
@pi-sigma pi-sigma force-pushed the task/2821-openklant2-config branch 2 times, most recently from 2a144b4 to 76c93ec Compare October 18, 2024 13:49
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.57%. Comparing base (16de4dc) to head (086aa0b).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/open_inwoner/openklant/models.py 84.21% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/open_inwoner/openklant/tests/helpers.py 66.66% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1452      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.58%   94.57%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1061     1061              
  Lines        39627    39659      +32     
===========================================
+ Hits         37481    37508      +27     
- Misses        2146     2151       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pi-sigma pi-sigma marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 14:11
Copy link
Contributor

@swrichards swrichards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, TLDR: let's try to not touch the openklant2 module at all if we can help it (except for the naming improvements you made in the client constructor).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed: this should be in open_inwoner.openklant -- it's domain specific.

src/openklant2/models.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/openklant2/client.py Show resolved Hide resolved
src/openklant2/tests/conftest.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pi-sigma pi-sigma marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2024 13:01
@pi-sigma pi-sigma marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants