Deleted resolved known limitations

README.md

@@ -194,28 +194,15 @@ provide an acceptable emphasis effect.
 instead of a whole shape. In general, all those effects whose rendering
 requires separation of the text frame from its parent shape are unlikely to be
 supported.
-9. ~~Text effects applied to paragraphs containing a mixture of standard text and
-equations in the new native PowerPoint 2013 format (i.e., not Equation Editor
-objects).~~
-10. ~~Accurate alignment of shapes in a group. This is hardly obtainable, as it
-depends on PowerPoint's copy&paste behavior. In the affected cases the same
-issue can be experienced with a manual copy&paste operation.~~
-11. Rasterized shape scaling. Indeed, PowerPoint applies effects to rasterized
+9. Rasterized shape scaling. Indeed, PowerPoint applies effects to rasterized
 versions of the shapes, thus proportionally scaling all their elements (e.g.,
 shape borders). Instead, PPspliT resizes the native shape, thus preserving its
 components (e.g., border thickness). The result is better because there is no
 _pixelize_ effect, but it may be a little different from expected. This
 difference is enhanced for the case of font scaling for grow/shrinking emphasis
 effects: PPspliT renders this by changing font size by an amount that is a good
 compromise between horizontal and vertical growth/shrink.
-12. ~~Accurate processing of emphasis effects affecting fill/line colors. For
-reasons which I haven't been able to figure out, sometimes color change
-settings in effects that are still to be processed get corrupted before
-reaching these effects, causing a failure to apply the intended color.~~
-13. ~~Handling the auto-fit property for text frames, due to some limits in the
-interface that PowerPoint offers for this property (in PPT<2007 it is
-totally absent, while in PPT 2007 it seems to work fairly well).~~
-14. Accurate rendering of some rotation effects. During the presentation
+10. Accurate rendering of some rotation effects. During the presentation
 PowerPoint rotates shapes around the center of the visible shape body. Instead,
 PPspliT rotates it around the center of the container box. To explain the
 difference, consider an arc, whose container box is the rectangle (or,
@@ -224,20 +211,17 @@ would rotate the arc around the center of the arc stroke itself, whereas
 PPspliT would rotate it around the center of the container box, which is
 usually larger, thus giving the impression that the visible shape (the arc)
 has "wandered around".
-15. Exit/entry effects applied to shapes that are part of a slide layout are only
+11. Exit/entry effects applied to shapes that are part of a slide layout are only
 partially supported. In fact, these shapes are turned into placeholders
 (instead of disappearing altogether) when one attempts to delete them.
-16. Adjustment of slide numbers on a PPTX file that is imported into PowerPoint
+12. Adjustment of slide numbers on a PPTX file that is imported into PowerPoint
 <=2003 using the Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack.
-17. Adjustment of (dynamic) slide numbers that appear in standard text boxes
+13. Adjustment of (dynamic) slide numbers that appear in standard text boxes
 (i.e., only slide numbers appearing in special placeholder boxes that are
 defined in slide masters and inserted as headers/footers in the slide deck are
 recognized and supported).
-18. ~~Handling of bullet symbols in itemized lists: bullets may sometimes be lost
-or replaced with other symbols due to PowerPoint issues in pasting paragraph
-formats and to the inability to access the picture currently used for a bullet.~~
-19. Animations in slide masters.
-20. Something else I am not aware of.
+14. Animations in slide masters.
+15. Something else I am not aware of.
 
 ---