Replace table of GeoIP client APIs with links to specific sections of… #1243
Conversation
Deploying dev-site with
|
| Latest commit: |
9dd2de3
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://36d53bdc.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://kevin-client-apis.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev |
kevcenteno
force-pushed
the
kevin/client-apis
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1315ae4 to
d71aa8e
Compare
… the db documentation landing page
kevcenteno
force-pushed
the
kevin/client-apis
branch
from
d71aa8e to
7a94f55
Compare
assets/snippets/binary-databases.md
Outdated
| @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ | |||
| Binary databases make use of the | |||
| [MaxMind DB file format](https://maxmind.github.io/MaxMind-DB/). MaxMind | |||
| provides official client APIs in the language listed below. The following client | |||
| APIs are open source and licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. | |||
| provides [official client APIs](https://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/docs/databases/#official-client-apis) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These links probably shouldn't include the scheme and hostname. It might make sense to use ref/relref too, but I don't see us using that Hugo feature elsewhere.
| provides official client APIs in the language listed below. The following client | ||
| APIs are open source and licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. | ||
| provides [official client APIs](/geoip/docs/databases/#official-client-apis) | ||
| that are open source and licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. We also provide a list of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not new, but for newer things, we tend to license under Apache 2 or MIT rather than just Apache 2. This makes our libraries more compatible with GPL v2. The Ruby libraries, for instance, are licensed this way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah okay, should I mention that our open source libraries are licensed under either Apache or MIT, or could I just omit mentioning the license types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I personally think we could just leave it vague without specifying the particular licenses. @christophermluna do you have a preference?
… the db documentation landing page