-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PX4 MAV_CMD_NAV_LOITER_TO_ALT and cleanup #3730
Conversation
453d526
to
fd9a5a3
Compare
"decimalPlaces": 0 | ||
}, | ||
"param4": { | ||
"label": "Next waypoint start:", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bit concerned about such a long label fitting on all form factors. I'm going to have to merge and try on a phone to see.
This is about my third try at naming this field.
|
Oh, it's that one! I messed around with it for a while and decided to give up until 3.1 :) |
Do you know how to get PX4 SITL to be fixed wing? |
You have to use master.
|
I responded without thinking. This hasn't been merged in PX4 yet. |
No problem. I just want to test the ui layout. |
Isn't this for any fixed wing? Seems like it should be on both PX4 and APM. Also isn't there more than one message affected: mavlink/mavlink#531 (comment) |
Yes, I suppose I should do that. Not sure about the heading hold. Could we structure the metadata like this? I think this makes sense with PX4 only using the common mavlink messages.
|
The structure should be:
It's not about where the command comes from. That doesn't really matter. It's about whether the command works differently and hence needs different ui given vehicle type and/or firmware type. |
Ok, I figured PX4 and common would be close enough that they could just be the same. Maybe not. |
Common is mavlink generic so it has to have all the fields defined that are available in the mavlink spec. But both PX4 and ArduPilot have many cases where they have not implemented the full set of fields. Because of that you can't use PX4 as Common since it is not to mavlink spec in various places. |
Moving this to 3.1 |
I've synced up PX4 and APM fixed wing. |
Merge now or wait for the better hierarchy? |
Good for now |
No description provided.