Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update bytes to 0.6. #51

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

najamelan
Copy link
Contributor

This allows dependent crates to use the latest version of bytes.

@mxinden
Copy link

mxinden commented Nov 4, 2020

@matthunz friendly ping. What do you think of bumping bytes?

@mxinden
Copy link

mxinden commented Nov 17, 2020

I will try once more. @matthunz would you mind taking a look at this pull request? This is blocking all downstream crates to update. Please let me know in case I can be of any help.

@pimeys
Copy link

pimeys commented Jan 4, 2021

This should now go to bytes 1.0, and it would be great if we'd get a new version soon. :)

@Keruspe
Copy link

Keruspe commented Jan 5, 2021

@matthunz do you need help for getting a released with bytes 1.0?

@mxinden
Copy link

mxinden commented Jan 14, 2021

futures-codec not updating to bytes v1.0 blocked many downstream crates e.g. rust-libp2p to upgrade other dependencies. I decided to fork futures-codec to provide a fully upgraded version: https://github.com/mxinden/asynchronous-codec

For now asynchronous-codec is a 1-to-1 fork of futures-codec, differing only in its dependency versions. In the future I plan to incorporate improvements like #54 while keeping dependencies up to date via Dependabot.

@matthunz I am happy to collaborate on merging the two projects (futures-codec and asynchronous-codec) again. This likely goes without saying: I forked futures-codec out of necessity, not out of bad faith. I preserved the git history and license. In addition you are mentioned as the original author in the readme. Thanks for open sourcing futures-codec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants