-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add message broker module #11
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few suggestions. I think this is generally good enough for a starting point.
New changes:
@pablo-de-andres for info. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed offline, please move the models into the https://github.com/materials-marketplace/standard-app-api code base. PR should be into the version-0.1.0 branch until that is merged.
I would suggest that you address my other comments prior to the move so that we can conclude the discussion before clustering it across repositories.
@yoavnash How do you want to move forward? Should we make a (pre-?) release of https://github.com/materials-marketplace/standard-app-api and then update the PR here? Or do you want to temporarily depend on the git repository? |
I think it would be great to have a proper release of the |
Blocked by: materials-marketplace/standard-app-api#10 |
@yoavnash The marketplace-standard-app-api package version 0.1.0 is now published on PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/marketplace-standard-app-api/ and can be installed with |
Great :) |
Some tests fail. @csadorf Do you think it has to do with the api package not supporting Python 3.8? |
Yes, it does. I will update the Python SDK requirements. |
@yoavnash Please rebase this branch on |
…hon-sdk into message_broker
Done. It's still failing though |
Yes, I think this is an unrelated issue either with the runners or the actions. Currently checking whether updating the actions in #16 resolves the issue. |
@yoavnash #16 has passed, would you mind rebasing once more on |
This time I merged instead of rebasing. The problem seems to be resolved. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the dependencies must be adjusted, otherwise good.
Thanks a lot @yoavnash ! 👍 |
Closes #10