Solution #404
Solution #404
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this task! 😊 While your code is well-structured and meets most of the task requirements, there's a critical issue with the ArticlePage constructor that needs to be addressed before we can approve the pull request.
Key Issue:
ArticlePageConstructor: The assignment tothis.urlon line 23 overrides theurlproperty set by thesuper(url)call. This could lead to unexpected behavior if theurlproperty is intended to be used elsewhere in thePageObjectclass. It's important to either use a different property name for the combined URL or ensure that this behavior is intentional and won't cause issues in other parts of the code.
Once this issue is resolved, your solution should be ready for approval. Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need further assistance! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
src/pageObject.js
Outdated
| constructor(url, slug) { | ||
| super(url); | ||
| this.url = url + slug; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the ArticlePage constructor, the this.url assignment on line 23 overrides the url property set by the super(url) call. This could lead to unexpected behavior if url is intended to be used elsewhere in the PageObject class. Consider using a different property name for the combined URL or ensure that this behavior is intentional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on your submission! 🎉 Your code is generally well-structured and meets the task requirements. However, there is a critical issue with the ArticlePage constructor: the assignment to this.url on line 23 overrides the url property set by the super(url) call. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the url property is intended to be used elsewhere in the PageObject class. Consider using a different property name for the combined URL or ensure that this behavior is intentional and won't cause issues in other parts of the code.
Overall, your implementation is correct and aligns with the specified requirements. Keep up the good work, and make sure to address the mentioned issue to avoid similar problems in the future. This decision is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Keep improving and learning from your experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| super(url); | ||
| this.url += slug; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assignment to this.url on line 23 overrides the url property set by the super(url) call. Consider using a different property name for the combined URL or ensure this behavior is intentional and won't cause issues in other parts of the code.
No description provided.