PNK fails to identify an improper number

[j-pk]

I made a simple textfield to test various phone number inputs.

This # entry 202 00e 0000 returns with a PremiumRate type and the toE164 string value is +1202003000

It does appear to be taking the alphabetical keypad entry you find on a phone and converting its value. So, would this be a valid entry or should an error return stating it's not a number?

Anyways, just thought I share my findings.

[marmelroy]

Ah yes... good find. Looks like I didn't throw an error at the right place. Fix very soon.

[marmelroy]

Fixed with 0.1.6. Thanks again @j-pk

[marmelroy]

Also added an automatic test to make sure this issue doesn't come back.