-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(skin-themeroller) Filter is dimming even though mode "hide" is set #230
Comments
It obviously works here: http://wwwendt.de/tech/fancytree/demo/sample-ext-filter.html, so please post a sample what is different in your application. |
Don't forget that parent nodes that would normally be hidden will be dimmed instead if they have children that are visible. |
Am I right in thinking that if my tree object has "enableFilter" as true, mode as "hide" and the filter extension loaded then it should be hiding nodes? If so, it's not working... If there's some other setting that affects it, then it's not obvious. |
You should not need to set enableFilter directly, just call I think this demo shows everything: http://wwwendt.de/tech/fancytree/demo/sample-ext-filter.html |
I had the same exact issue as described in the title. The error is in the skin you are using. It didn't work for me while I used a skin-themeroller, but it works on every other skin. |
Thanks for reporting |
I set this in the initialization:
filter: {
mode: "hide"
},
And on inspecting the tree using chrome debug tools, it confirms that the mode is "hide" and yet the tree dims unmatched nodes, it doesn't hide them!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: