How to capture meta-mappings (mappings of mappings into SSSOM)

[matentzn]

We frequently have the situation where we take an external mapping provided as a spreadsheet (e.g. from NCIT, SNOMED, etc) and wish to convert it to SSSOM for further processing. The question is what to best do about the metamodel mapping. Let's say we have this raw data:

HPO Term	MPO Term	Mapping
HP:123	MP:123	EXACT
HP:124	MP:124	BROAD

It seems wasteful to import this as:

subject_id	object_id	predicate_id
HP:123	MP:123	someCrazyNamespace:EXACT
HP:124	MP:124	someCrazyNamespace:BROAD

Rather we would like something like:

subject_id	object_id	predicate_id
HP:123	MP:123	skos:exactMatch
HP:124	MP:124	skos:broadMatch

Where do we capture that

someCrazyNamespace:EXACT ---> skos:exactMatch

• 👍 In a separate SSSOM file? Which we somehow link to this one.
• 👀 In the description field?
• 🎉 In a new element somewhere?

I notice these kinds of questions are relevant everywhere, like LinkML etc, but just thinking out loud now. Any ideas anyone?

[jonquet]

I would not try to capture this.
Here is my 2 cents:
Producing another SSSOM file with SKOS properties rather than the original ones would means "creating a new set of mappings" with provenance/source the ones produced originally.
Then a bunch of metadata must change.
The commitment/responsibility of going from someCrazyNamespace:EXACT to skos:exactMatch must come with a bunch of new metadata and in best case scenario curation.
Except if NCI or SNOMED natively adopt these SKOS properties then "standardizing" their data/mappings will mean producing new data.

[graybeal]

I would (as a user) try to capture it with the minimal work possible. To me that means translate the original into true SKOS properties (as I think Clement is saying), but figure out a way to say the source for the mappings, and that my exactMatch mappings came from EXACT, and so on (i.e., the translation rules). At least where I could. Or better, I could just point to the software that creates the mappings, which should be in some git repo and which will provide the exact translation methods.

In either case, you don't have to solve it as part of SSSOM, not part of the standard. That's what best practices are for.

[matentzn]

So @graybeal you would merely write a comment or provide a link to the python script to document the translation rules?

[graybeal]

I think repeating the rules in the mapping file would be time consuming and error prone. Pointing to the IRI of the conversion software is basic good provenance. So that’s a yes.

…

________________________________ From: Nico Matentzoglu ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2022 2:15:06 PM To: mapping-commons/sssom ***@***.***> Cc: John Graybeal ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [mapping-commons/sssom] How to capture meta-mappings (mappings of mappings into SSSOM) (Issue #145) So @graybeal<https://github.com/graybeal> you would merely write a comment or provide a link to the python script to document the translation rules? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#145 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJVJUFWWUSP7RBVABMYOO3VGHANVANCNFSM5PKJ6Q3Q>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>