Add Section to README for Extensions #64
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi there! I'm the author of pycoingecko_extra which is an extension of this base api client that adds a few new features like
I also have a few more future ideas of how to improve my extension of the client. My client extends the base class of this client and operates the exact same way, and the additional functionality is opt-in. Check out my README for more info.
I see my project as having a symbiotic relationship with the base client, as it merely extends instead of replacing the base api client. I am in no way am trying to replace this project, just build upon it :)
I was wondering if you would be willing to add an Extensions section to the README that links to my extension, so that users can discover it if they are interested in its feature set. This PR contains the relevant changes.
I'd also be interested to hear if you would be willing to allow me to integrate this advanced feature set into the base client itself via a future pull request. My design is a little more opinionated then the base client which is minimal, so I'd also be fine keeping the two as separate projects.