Skip to content

Code Quality Fix: Invalid @var usage #40137

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 2.4-develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lbajsarowicz
Copy link
Contributor

@lbajsarowicz lbajsarowicz commented Aug 12, 2025

Description (*)

This Pull Request answers the need of consistent @var notation in all the Magento files.

The only valid format is: @var ["Type"] [element_name] [<description>] (https://docs.phpdoc.org/guide/references/phpdoc/tags/var.html) but Magento did not follow this format, which now needs to be fixed.

image

Related Pull Requests

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Fixes magento/magento2#<issue_number>

Manual testing scenarios (*)

  1. No change to the actual codebase, no testing is necessary.
  2. ...

Questions or comments

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • README.md files for modified modules are updated and included in the pull request if any README.md predefined sections require an update
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Hi @lbajsarowicz. Thank you for your contribution!
Here are some useful tips on how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names.

Allowed build names are:
  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests
  13. Semantic Version Checker

You can find more information about the builds here
ℹ️ Run only required test builds during development. Run all test builds before sending your pull request for review.


For more details, review the Code Contributions documentation.
Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.

@ct-prd-pr-scan
Copy link

The security team has been informed about this pull request due to the presence of risky security keywords. For security vulnerability reports, please visit Adobe's vulnerability disclosure program on HackerOne or email psirt@adobe.com.

1 similar comment
@ct-prd-pr-scan
Copy link

The security team has been informed about this pull request due to the presence of risky security keywords. For security vulnerability reports, please visit Adobe's vulnerability disclosure program on HackerOne or email psirt@adobe.com.

@lbajsarowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

(I submitted clear issue when the class was not defined, new version skips such)

@ct-prd-pr-scan
Copy link

The security team has been informed about this pull request due to the presence of risky security keywords. For security vulnerability reports, please visit Adobe's vulnerability disclosure program on HackerOne or email psirt@adobe.com.

@lbajsarowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

I found a few more issues with the codebase, fixed.

@ihor-sviziev
Copy link
Contributor

ihor-sviziev commented Aug 13, 2025

We discussed this with @lbajsarowicz in Slack. So far, merging 300+ files in one step is almost impossible, as it would require a huge amount of static test fixes and, certainly, cause conflicts with releases that would need to be fixed multiple times.
I don't think this realistically can be merged any time soon.
Instead, I suggest adding a static test that would fail if the @var is misused. Then, those failures could be fixed with smaller pieces

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants