-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LGPL license? #66
Comments
If we are to change the license I'd prefer to go with MPL-2.0 instead of LGPL. Would all contributors agree changing the license to MPL? CC: @grego @tiagolobocastro @halvko @MrJohz @creativcoder @htrefil |
I have no problem with that
/Erik Funder Carstensen ***@***.***)
…On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, at 11:57, Maciej Hirsz wrote:
If we are to change the license I'd prefer to go with MPL-2.0 instead of LGPL.
Would all contributors agree changing the license to MPL?
CC: @grego <https://github.com/grego> @tiagolobocastro <https://github.com/tiagolobocastro> @halvko <https://github.com/halvko> @MrJohz <https://github.com/MrJohz> @creativcoder <https://github.com/creativcoder> @htrefil <https://github.com/htrefil>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#66 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAS2UUTL2NCTF6ZP2NSTMRDYY3CCBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6ADYEBKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMBTGYYDCMRTHE>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I prefer GPL, but I agree if others do. |
Sounds good to me :) |
I'm okay with this being changed to MPL as well. |
Context: There is a PR for the paperclip crate (paperclip-rs/paperclip#506) that introduces openAPI v3 spec + moustache templates and adds ramhorns as a dependency for processing said templates. However, since ramhorns is under GPL v3 and the paperclip crate is licensed under MIT then merging this would require changing the entire crate's license to GPL v3, which is something that the author (understandably) doesn't want to do. In that case relicensing ramhorns under LGPL v3 would allow it to be included there (while retaining most of the benefits of GPL v3 license)
Is it something that's feasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: