You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The idea is that a few basic checks should exists and be the same for every copulas. In these tests, we might include :
Marginal uniformity, to ensure that the model is indeed a copula. This can include verifying that the cdf has uniform margins AND that marginals samples are uniformely distributed (so a check on the cdf and a check on the samples). We alreayd have this one but we could generlize it a bit more and make it automatic
check mandatory values of pdf&cdf on the frontier of the hypercube
check that cdf is in [0,1] and that pdf is positive on some random points
check numerically that the pdf is indeed the derivative of the cdf indeed
check that tau \circ tau_inv is the identity on the domain
check that rho \circ rho_inv is identitdy in the domain
check that fitting the model works under a sklardist construct
Archimedean have specific tests themselves.
Generators could be checked numerically to be indeed monotone enough (compute theoretically the derivatives up to d-2 for exemple and check signs).
Some of these checks need to filter the models on the ones that implements a certain method... this looks complicated to do and i do not really want to do it by hand, but it is the right thing to do i think. Other ideas on stuff that could be automaticcally checked ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The idea is that a few basic checks should exists and be the same for every copulas. In these tests, we might include :
Marginal uniformity, to ensure that the model is indeed a copula. This can include verifying that the cdf has uniform margins AND that marginals samples are uniformely distributed (so a check on the cdf and a check on the samples). We alreayd have this one but we could generlize it a bit more and make it automatic
check mandatory values of pdf&cdf on the frontier of the hypercube
check that cdf is in [0,1] and that pdf is positive on some random points
check numerically that the pdf is indeed the derivative of the cdf indeed
check that tau \circ tau_inv is the identity on the domain
check that rho \circ rho_inv is identitdy in the domain
check that fitting the model works under a sklardist construct
Archimedean have specific tests themselves.
Generators could be checked numerically to be indeed monotone enough (compute theoretically the derivatives up to d-2 for exemple and check signs).
Some of these checks need to filter the models on the ones that implements a certain method... this looks complicated to do and i do not really want to do it by hand, but it is the right thing to do i think. Other ideas on stuff that could be automaticcally checked ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: