weird table issue

lrnv · Feb 10, 2024 · 6d5f5c5 · 6d5f5c5
1 parent fac5da4
commit 6d5f5c5
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/joss/paper.md b/joss/paper.md
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ There are competing packages in Julia, such as [`BivariateCopulas.jl`](https://g
 
 Since our primary target is maintainability and readability of the implementation, we did not consider the efficiency and the performance of the code yet. However, a (limited in scope) benchmark on Clayton's pdf shows competitive behavior of our implementation w.r.t `DatagenCopulaBased.jl` (but not `BivariateCopulas.jl`). To perform this test we use the [`BenchmarkTools.jl`](https://github.com/JuliaCI/BenchmarkTools.jl) [@BenchmarkTools] package and generate 10^6 samples for Clayton copulas of dimensions 2, 5, 10 with parameter 0.8. The execution times (in seconds) are given below: 
 
-| Package \ Dimension | 2 | 5 | 10 |
-|-----------------------------|------|-----------|
+|                             | 2         | 5         | 10        |
+|-----------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
 | Copulas.Clayton             | 1.1495578 | 1.3448951 | 1.8044065 |
-| BivariateCopulas.Clayton    | 0.1331608 | X | X |
+| BivariateCopulas.Clayton    | 0.1331608 |         X |         X |
 | DatagenCopulaBased.Clayton  | 1.9868345 | 2.4276321 | 2.8009263 |
 
 Code for these benchmarks in available in the repository.