[RISCV] Remove stale comments. NFC #94925
Merged
+0
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We no longer have _TU pseudo instructions. I'm not sure if we have any unsuffixed instructions w/o mask w/ passthru w/o policy operand. That case is not covered by the earlier comments. I could find any from a quick audit.
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Craig Topper (topperc) ChangesWe no longer have _TU pseudo instructions. I'm not sure if we have any unsuffixed instructions w/o mask w/ passthru w/o policy operand. That case is not covered by the earlier comments. I could find any from a quick audit. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94925.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfoVPseudos.td b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfoVPseudos.td
index 77d3644687fdd..a206974e53e51 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfoVPseudos.td
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfoVPseudos.td
@@ -67,11 +67,6 @@
/// that terminology in code frequently refers to these as "TA" which is
/// confusing. We're in the process of migrating away from this
/// representation.
-/// * _TU w/o policy operand -- Has a passthrough operand, and always
-/// represents the tail undisturbed state.
-/// * _TU w/policy operand - Can represent all three policy states. If
-/// passthrough is IMPLICIT_DEF (or NoReg), then represents "undefined".
-/// Otherwise, policy operand and tablegen flags drive the interpretation.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
Lukacma
pushed a commit
to Lukacma/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
We no longer have _TU pseudo instructions. I'm not sure if we have any unsuffixed instructions w/o mask w/ passthru w/o policy operand. That case is not covered by the earlier comments. I could not find any from a quick audit.
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We no longer have _TU pseudo instructions.
I'm not sure if we have any unsuffixed instructions w/o mask w/ passthru w/o policy operand. That case is not covered by the earlier comments. I could find any from a quick audit.