-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[C++20] [Modules] Don't diagnose duplicated implicit decl in multiple named modules #102423
Conversation
… named modules Close llvm#102360 Close llvm#102349 http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15.3 makes it clear that the duplicated deinition are not allowed to be attached to named modules. But we need to filter the implicit declarations as user can do nothing about it and the diagnostic message is annoying.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9) Changeshttp://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15.3 makes it clear that the duplicated deinition are not allowed to be attached to named modules. But we need to filter the implicit declarations as user can do nothing about it and the diagnostic message is annoying. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102423.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp
index 0ced5f9290408f..10599849b69bc8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp
@@ -3684,6 +3684,54 @@ static void inheritDefaultTemplateArguments(ASTContext &Context,
}
}
+// [basic.link]/p10:
+// If two declarations of an entity are attached to different modules,
+// the program is ill-formed;
+static void checkMultipleDefinitionInNamedModules(ASTReader &Reader, Decl *D,
+ Decl *Previous) {
+ Module *M = Previous->getOwningModule();
+
+ // We only care about the case in named modules.
+ if (!M || !M->isNamedModule())
+ return;
+
+ // If it is previous implcitly introduced, it is not meaningful to
+ // diagnose it.
+ if (Previous->isImplicit())
+ return;
+
+ // FIXME: Get rid of the enumeration of decl types once we have an appropriate
+ // abstract for decls of an entity. e.g., the namespace decl and using decl
+ // doesn't introduce an entity.
+ if (!isa<VarDecl, FunctionDecl, TagDecl, RedeclarableTemplateDecl>(Previous))
+ return;
+
+ // Skip implicit instantiations since it may give false positive diagnostic
+ // messages.
+ // FIXME: Maybe this shows the implicit instantiations may have incorrect
+ // module owner ships. But given we've finished the compilation of a module,
+ // how can we add new entities to that module?
+ if (auto *VTSD = dyn_cast<VarTemplateSpecializationDecl>(Previous);
+ VTSD && !VTSD->isExplicitSpecialization())
+ return;
+ if (auto *CTSD = dyn_cast<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(Previous);
+ CTSD && !CTSD->isExplicitSpecialization())
+ return;
+ if (auto *Func = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(Previous))
+ if (auto *FTSI = Func->getTemplateSpecializationInfo();
+ FTSI && !FTSI->isExplicitSpecialization())
+ return;
+
+ // It is fine if they are in the same module.
+ if (Reader.getContext().isInSameModule(M, D->getOwningModule()))
+ return;
+
+ Reader.Diag(Previous->getLocation(),
+ diag::err_multiple_decl_in_different_modules)
+ << cast<NamedDecl>(Previous) << M->Name;
+ Reader.Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::note_also_found);
+}
+
void ASTDeclReader::attachPreviousDecl(ASTReader &Reader, Decl *D,
Decl *Previous, Decl *Canon) {
assert(D && Previous);
@@ -3697,22 +3745,7 @@ void ASTDeclReader::attachPreviousDecl(ASTReader &Reader, Decl *D,
#include "clang/AST/DeclNodes.inc"
}
- // [basic.link]/p10:
- // If two declarations of an entity are attached to different modules,
- // the program is ill-formed;
- //
- // FIXME: Get rid of the enumeration of decl types once we have an appropriate
- // abstract for decls of an entity. e.g., the namespace decl and using decl
- // doesn't introduce an entity.
- if (Module *M = Previous->getOwningModule();
- M && M->isNamedModule() &&
- isa<VarDecl, FunctionDecl, TagDecl, RedeclarableTemplateDecl>(Previous) &&
- !Reader.getContext().isInSameModule(M, D->getOwningModule())) {
- Reader.Diag(Previous->getLocation(),
- diag::err_multiple_decl_in_different_modules)
- << cast<NamedDecl>(Previous) << M->Name;
- Reader.Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::note_also_found);
- }
+ checkMultipleDefinitionInNamedModules(Reader, D, Previous);
// If the declaration was visible in one module, a redeclaration of it in
// another module remains visible even if it wouldn't be visible by itself.
diff --git a/clang/test/Modules/pr102349.cppm b/clang/test/Modules/pr102349.cppm
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..2d166c9e93fcfc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Modules/pr102349.cppm
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/a.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/a.pcm
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/b.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/b.pcm \
+// RUN: -fprebuilt-module-path=%t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/c.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/c.pcm \
+// RUN: -fprebuilt-module-path=%t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/d.cpp -fsyntax-only -verify \
+// RUN: -fprebuilt-module-path=%t
+
+//--- a.cppm
+export module a;
+
+export template<typename>
+struct a;
+
+template<typename>
+struct a {
+};
+
+export template<typename T>
+constexpr auto aa = a<T>();
+
+//--- b.cppm
+export module b;
+
+import a;
+
+static void b() {
+ static_cast<void>(a<void>());
+}
+
+//--- c.cppm
+export module c;
+
+import a;
+
+static void c() {
+ static_cast<void>(aa<void>);
+}
+
+//--- d.cpp
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+import a;
+import b;
+import c;
+
+static void d() {
+ static_cast<void>(a<void>());
+}
diff --git a/clang/test/Modules/pr102360.cppm b/clang/test/Modules/pr102360.cppm
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..e0dab1a0318015
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Modules/pr102360.cppm
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/a.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/a.pcm
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/b.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/b.pcm \
+// RUN: -fprebuilt-module-path=%t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/c.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/c.pcm \
+// RUN: -fprebuilt-module-path=%t
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/d.cpp -fsyntax-only -verify \
+// RUN: -fprebuilt-module-path=%t
+
+//--- a.cppm
+export module a;
+
+template<typename>
+constexpr auto impl = true;
+
+export template<typename T>
+void a() {
+}
+
+export template<typename T> requires impl<T>
+void a() {
+}
+
+//--- b.cppm
+export module b;
+
+import a;
+
+static void b() {
+ a<void>();
+}
+
+//--- c.cppm
+export module c;
+
+import a;
+
+static void c() {
+ a<void>();
+}
+
+//--- d.cpp
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+import a;
+import b;
+import c;
+
+static void d() {
+ a<void>();
+}
|
/cherry-pick e72d956 |
… named modules (llvm#102423) Close llvm#102360 Close llvm#102349 http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15.3 makes it clear that the duplicated deinition are not allowed to be attached to named modules. But we need to filter the implicit declarations as user can do nothing about it and the diagnostic message is annoying. (cherry picked from commit e72d956)
/pull-request #102425 |
… named modules (llvm#102423) Close llvm#102360 Close llvm#102349 http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15.3 makes it clear that the duplicated deinition are not allowed to be attached to named modules. But we need to filter the implicit declarations as user can do nothing about it and the diagnostic message is annoying. (cherry picked from commit e72d956)
… named modules (llvm#102423) Close llvm#102360 Close llvm#102349 http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15.3 makes it clear that the duplicated deinition are not allowed to be attached to named modules. But we need to filter the implicit declarations as user can do nothing about it and the diagnostic message is annoying.
Close #102360
Close #102349
http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.def.odr#15.3 makes it clear that the duplicated deinition are not allowed to be attached to named modules.
But we need to filter the implicit declarations as user can do nothing about it and the diagnostic message is annoying.