Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Revert "[SimplifyCFG] When only one case value is missing, replace de…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…fault with that case (#76669)"

This reverts commit 7d81e07, which introduces a
compiler memory usage regression. See
#76669 (comment)
  • Loading branch information
alexfh committed Jan 17, 2024
1 parent af9be74 commit 0f8745b
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 10 additions and 142 deletions.
35 changes: 7 additions & 28 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5414,13 +5414,11 @@ static bool CasesAreContiguous(SmallVectorImpl<ConstantInt *> &Cases) {
}

static void createUnreachableSwitchDefault(SwitchInst *Switch,
DomTreeUpdater *DTU,
bool RemoveOrigDefaultBlock = true) {
DomTreeUpdater *DTU) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SimplifyCFG: switch default is dead.\n");
auto *BB = Switch->getParent();
auto *OrigDefaultBlock = Switch->getDefaultDest();
if (RemoveOrigDefaultBlock)
OrigDefaultBlock->removePredecessor(BB);
OrigDefaultBlock->removePredecessor(BB);
BasicBlock *NewDefaultBlock = BasicBlock::Create(
BB->getContext(), BB->getName() + ".unreachabledefault", BB->getParent(),
OrigDefaultBlock);
Expand All @@ -5429,8 +5427,7 @@ static void createUnreachableSwitchDefault(SwitchInst *Switch,
if (DTU) {
SmallVector<DominatorTree::UpdateType, 2> Updates;
Updates.push_back({DominatorTree::Insert, BB, &*NewDefaultBlock});
if (RemoveOrigDefaultBlock &&
!is_contained(successors(BB), OrigDefaultBlock))
if (!is_contained(successors(BB), OrigDefaultBlock))
Updates.push_back({DominatorTree::Delete, BB, &*OrigDefaultBlock});
DTU->applyUpdates(Updates);
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -5612,28 +5609,10 @@ static bool eliminateDeadSwitchCases(SwitchInst *SI, DomTreeUpdater *DTU,
Known.getBitWidth() - (Known.Zero | Known.One).popcount();
assert(NumUnknownBits <= Known.getBitWidth());
if (HasDefault && DeadCases.empty() &&
NumUnknownBits < 64 /* avoid overflow */) {
uint64_t AllNumCases = 1ULL << NumUnknownBits;
if (SI->getNumCases() == AllNumCases) {
createUnreachableSwitchDefault(SI, DTU);
return true;
}
// When only one case value is missing, replace default with that case.
// Eliminating the default branch will provide more opportunities for
// optimization, such as lookup tables.
if (SI->getNumCases() == AllNumCases - 1) {
assert(NumUnknownBits > 1 && "Should be canonicalized to a branch");
uint64_t MissingCaseVal = 0;
for (const auto &Case : SI->cases())
MissingCaseVal ^= Case.getCaseValue()->getValue().getLimitedValue();
auto *MissingCase =
cast<ConstantInt>(ConstantInt::get(Cond->getType(), MissingCaseVal));
SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper SIW(*SI);
SIW.addCase(MissingCase, SI->getDefaultDest(), SIW.getSuccessorWeight(0));
createUnreachableSwitchDefault(SI, DTU, /*RemoveOrigDefaultBlock*/ false);
SIW.setSuccessorWeight(0, 0);
return true;
}
NumUnknownBits < 64 /* avoid overflow */ &&
SI->getNumCases() == (1ULL << NumUnknownBits)) {
createUnreachableSwitchDefault(SI, DTU);
return true;
}

if (DeadCases.empty())
Expand Down

This file was deleted.

56 changes: 3 additions & 53 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/switch-dead-default.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,15 +79,15 @@ default:
ret void
}

; We can replace the default branch with case 3 since it is the only case that is missing.
; This one is a negative test - we know the value of the default,
; but that's about it
define void @test3(i2 %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test3(
; CHECK-SAME: i2 [[A:%.*]]) {
; CHECK-NEXT: switch i2 [[A]], label [[DOTUNREACHABLEDEFAULT:%.*]] [
; CHECK-NEXT: switch i2 [[A]], label [[DEFAULT:%.*]] [
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 0, label [[CASE0:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 1, label [[CASE1:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 -2, label [[CASE2:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 -1, label [[DEFAULT:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ]
; CHECK: common.ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
Expand All @@ -100,8 +100,6 @@ define void @test3(i2 %a) {
; CHECK: case2:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo(i32 2)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[COMMON_RET]]
; CHECK: .unreachabledefault:
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
; CHECK: default:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo(i32 3)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[COMMON_RET]]
Expand All @@ -124,50 +122,6 @@ default:
ret void
}

define void @test3_prof(i2 %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test3_prof(
; CHECK-SAME: i2 [[A:%.*]]) {
; CHECK-NEXT: switch i2 [[A]], label [[DOTUNREACHABLEDEFAULT:%.*]] [
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 0, label [[CASE0:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 1, label [[CASE1:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 -2, label [[CASE2:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i2 -1, label [[DEFAULT:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ], !prof [[PROF0:![0-9]+]]
; CHECK: common.ret:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
; CHECK: case0:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo(i32 0)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[COMMON_RET:%.*]]
; CHECK: case1:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo(i32 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[COMMON_RET]]
; CHECK: case2:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo(i32 2)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[COMMON_RET]]
; CHECK: .unreachabledefault:
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
; CHECK: default:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @foo(i32 3)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[COMMON_RET]]
;
switch i2 %a, label %default [i2 0, label %case0
i2 1, label %case1
i2 2, label %case2], !prof !0

case0:
call void @foo(i32 0)
ret void
case1:
call void @foo(i32 1)
ret void
case2:
call void @foo(i32 2)
ret void
default:
call void @foo(i32 3)
ret void
}

; Negative test - check for possible overflow when computing
; number of possible cases.
define void @test4(i128 %a) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -313,7 +267,3 @@ default:

declare void @llvm.assume(i1)

!0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 8, i32 4, i32 2, i32 1}
;.
; CHECK: [[PROF0]] = !{!"branch_weights", i32 0, i32 4, i32 2, i32 1, i32 8}
;.

0 comments on commit 0f8745b

Please sign in to comment.