Throws do not support null as message

[vladhss]

I want to verify NullPointerException is thrown, but org.llorllale.cactoos.matchers.Throws fails when I use null as msg parameter. I want to be able to use it or have another constructor only with exception param.

[0crat]

@llorllale/z please, pay attention to this issue

[ilyakharlamov]

Unit test example: `

@test
public void nullMessageTest(){
    final Description description = new StringDescription();
    new Throws<>(null, NullPointerException.class).matchesSafely(
        () -> {
            final Object obj = null;
            return obj.getClass();
        },
        description
    );
}`

[llorllale]

@0crat in

[llorllale]

@Umbrah let's add a ctor that takes in just the exception type

[0crat]

@0crat in (here)

@llorllale Job #119 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @umbrah/z

[0crat]

The job #119 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[victornoel]

@0crat wait for #126 to be merged

[0crat]

@0crat wait for #126 to be merged (here)

@victornoel The impediment for #119 was registered successfully by @victornoel/z

[victornoel]

@Umbrah this has been fixed in #126, the issue can now be closed :)

[victornoel]

@llorllale the reporter does not seem to answer, can we close this?

[victornoel]

@llorllale @Umbrah ping

[llorllale]

@umbrah closing due to unresponsiveness (PR #126 merged for this)

[0crat]

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @victornoel/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[0crat]

Job #119 is not in the agenda of @victornoel/z, can't inspect

[0crat]

The job #119 is now out of scope

[g4s8]

@0crat status

[0crat]

@0crat status (here)

@g4s8 This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:

• The job #119 is not in scope
• The job is waiting quality review verdict by @sereshqua/z for 7hr
• @victornoel/z will receive 30 minutes after quality review
• Job footprint (restricted area)

[sereshqua]

@ilyakharlamov can you please edit your comment that it start with the user'w name it is referred to? otherwise quality is acceptable here

[victornoel]

@sereshqua I don't think @ilyakharlamov is here anymore with us.

[sereshqua]

@victornoel, yeap, just a matter of policy, so issue performer knows why quality is not good

[victornoel]

@sereshqua I understand, but you never told 0crat about the quality in the end ;)

[sereshqua]

@0cat quality acceptable

[0pdd]

@0pdd quality acceptable

I see you're talking to me, but I can't reply since I'm not a chat bot.

[sereshqua]

@0crat quality acceptable

[0crat]

Order was finished, quality is "acceptable": +30 point(s) just awarded to @victornoel/z

[0crat]

Quality review completed: +4 point(s) just awarded to @sereshqua/z

[g4s8]

@0crat status