Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lkl: Fix fd_get_capacity failing to get the size of large files. #101

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Feb 28, 2016

Conversation

ngkaho1234
Copy link

On 32bit posix-compatible targets, fd_get_capacity() will fail when
the file size is too large.

Review on Reviewable

On 32bit posix-compatible targets, fd_get_capacity() will fail when
the file size is too large.
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2016
lkl: Fix fd_get_capacity failing to get the size of large files.
@ghost ghost merged commit 7cba3bf into lkl:master Feb 28, 2016
@ngkaho1234 ngkaho1234 deleted the fix-largefile-32bit-v2 branch February 29, 2016 10:29
thehajime pushed a commit to libos-nuse/lkl-linux that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2017
We cannot do printk() from tk_debug_account_sleep_time(), because
tk_debug_account_sleep_time() is called under tk_core seq lock.
The reason why printk() is unsafe there is that console_sem may
invoke scheduler (up()->wake_up_process()->activate_task()), which,
in turn, can return back to timekeeping code, for instance, via
get_time()->ktime_get(), deadlocking the system on tk_core seq lock.

[   48.950592] ======================================================
[   48.950622] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[   48.950622] 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ lkl#101 Not tainted
[   48.950622] -------------------------------------------------------
[   48.950622] kworker/0:0/3 is trying to acquire lock:
[   48.950653]  (tk_core){----..}, at: [<c01cc624>] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90
[   48.950683]
               but task is already holding lock:
[   48.950683]  (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90
[   48.950714]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[   48.950714]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   48.950714]
               -> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}:
[   48.950744]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[   48.950775]        lock_hrtimer_base+0x28/0x58
[   48.950775]        hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x20/0x5c8
[   48.950775]        __enqueue_rt_entity+0x320/0x360
[   48.950805]        enqueue_rt_entity+0x2c/0x44
[   48.950805]        enqueue_task_rt+0x24/0x94
[   48.950836]        ttwu_do_activate+0x54/0xc0
[   48.950836]        try_to_wake_up+0x248/0x5c8
[   48.950836]        __setup_irq+0x420/0x5f0
[   48.950836]        request_threaded_irq+0xdc/0x184
[   48.950866]        devm_request_threaded_irq+0x58/0xa4
[   48.950866]        omap_i2c_probe+0x530/0x6a0
[   48.950897]        platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0
[   48.950897]        driver_probe_device+0x1f8/0x2cc
[   48.950897]        __driver_attach+0xc0/0xc4
[   48.950927]        bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xa0
[   48.950927]        bus_add_driver+0x100/0x210
[   48.950927]        driver_register+0x78/0xf4
[   48.950958]        do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x16c
[   48.950958]        kernel_init_freeable+0x20c/0x2d8
[   48.950958]        kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[   48.950988]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.950988]
               -> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}:
[   48.951019]        _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
[   48.951019]        rq_offline_rt+0x9c/0x2bc
[   48.951019]        set_rq_offline.part.2+0x2c/0x58
[   48.951049]        rq_attach_root+0x134/0x144
[   48.951049]        cpu_attach_domain+0x18c/0x6f4
[   48.951049]        build_sched_domains+0xba4/0xd80
[   48.951080]        sched_init_smp+0x68/0x10c
[   48.951080]        kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2d8
[   48.951080]        kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[   48.951080]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.951110]
               -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[   48.951110]        _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
[   48.951141]        task_fork_fair+0x30/0x124
[   48.951141]        sched_fork+0x194/0x2e0
[   48.951141]        copy_process.part.5+0x448/0x1a20
[   48.951171]        _do_fork+0x98/0x7e8
[   48.951171]        kernel_thread+0x2c/0x34
[   48.951171]        rest_init+0x1c/0x18c
[   48.951202]        start_kernel+0x35c/0x3d4
[   48.951202]        0x8000807c
[   48.951202]
               -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[   48.951232]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[   48.951232]        try_to_wake_up+0x30/0x5c8
[   48.951232]        up+0x4c/0x60
[   48.951263]        __up_console_sem+0x2c/0x58
[   48.951263]        console_unlock+0x3b4/0x650
[   48.951263]        vprintk_emit+0x270/0x474
[   48.951293]        vprintk_default+0x20/0x28
[   48.951293]        printk+0x20/0x30
[   48.951324]        kauditd_hold_skb+0x94/0xb8
[   48.951324]        kauditd_thread+0x1a4/0x56c
[   48.951324]        kthread+0x104/0x148
[   48.951354]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.951354]
               -> #1 ((console_sem).lock){-.....}:
[   48.951385]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[   48.951385]        down_trylock+0xc/0x2c
[   48.951385]        __down_trylock_console_sem+0x24/0x80
[   48.951385]        console_trylock+0x10/0x8c
[   48.951416]        vprintk_emit+0x264/0x474
[   48.951416]        vprintk_default+0x20/0x28
[   48.951416]        printk+0x20/0x30
[   48.951446]        tk_debug_account_sleep_time+0x5c/0x70
[   48.951446]        __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime.constprop.3+0x170/0x1a0
[   48.951446]        timekeeping_resume+0x218/0x23c
[   48.951477]        syscore_resume+0x94/0x42c
[   48.951477]        suspend_enter+0x554/0x9b4
[   48.951477]        suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd8/0x4b4
[   48.951507]        enter_state+0x934/0xbd4
[   48.951507]        pm_suspend+0x14/0x70
[   48.951507]        state_store+0x68/0xc8
[   48.951538]        kernfs_fop_write+0xf4/0x1f8
[   48.951538]        __vfs_write+0x1c/0x114
[   48.951538]        vfs_write+0xa0/0x168
[   48.951568]        SyS_write+0x3c/0x90
[   48.951568]        __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10
[   48.951568]
               -> #0 (tk_core){----..}:
[   48.951599]        lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294
[   48.951599]        ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4
[   48.951629]        retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90
[   48.951629]        on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c
[   48.951629]        clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20
[   48.951660]        process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808
[   48.951660]        worker_thread+0x3c/0x550
[   48.951660]        kthread+0x104/0x148
[   48.951690]        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[   48.951690]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[   48.951690] Chain exists of:
                 tk_core --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock

[   48.951721]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[   48.951721]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   48.951721]        ----                    ----
[   48.951721]   lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
[   48.951751]                                lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
[   48.951751]                                lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
[   48.951751]   lock(tk_core);
[   48.951782]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[   48.951782] 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/3:
[   48.951782]  #0:  ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808
[   48.951812]  #1:  (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808
[   48.951843]  #2:  (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90
[   48.951843]   stack backtrace:
[   48.951873] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+
[   48.951904] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work
[   48.951904] [<c0110208>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c224>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[   48.951934] [<c010c224>] (show_stack) from [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack+0xac/0xe0)
[   48.951934] [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug+0x1d0/0x308)
[   48.951965] [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain+0xf50/0x1324)
[   48.951965] [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain) from [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire+0x468/0x7e8)
[   48.951995] [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294)
[   48.951995] [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire) from [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4)
[   48.952026] [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now) from [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90)
[   48.952026] [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event) from [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c)
[   48.952056] [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu) from [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20)
[   48.952056] [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work) from [<c015664c>] (process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808)
[   48.952087] [<c015664c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0157774>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x550)
[   48.952087] [<c0157774>] (worker_thread) from [<c015d644>] (kthread+0x104/0x148)
[   48.952087] [<c015d644>] (kthread) from [<c0107830>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)

Replace printk() with printk_deferred(), which does not call into
the scheduler.

Fixes: 0bf43f1 ("timekeeping: Prints the amounts of time spent during suspend")
Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "[4.9+]" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170215044332.30449-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Rondom pushed a commit to Rondom/linux-lkl that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2019
packet_sendmsg() checks tx_ring.pg_vec to decide
if it must call tpacket_snd().

Problem is that the check is lockless, meaning another thread
can issue a concurrent setsockopt(PACKET_TX_RING ) to flip
tx_ring.pg_vec back to NULL.

Given that tpacket_snd() grabs pg_vec_lock mutex, we can
perform the check again to solve the race.

syzbot reported :

kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
CPU: 1 PID: 11429 Comm: syz-executor394 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc4+ lkl#101
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:packet_lookup_frame+0x8d/0x270 net/packet/af_packet.c:474
Code: c1 ee 03 f7 73 0c 80 3c 0e 00 0f 85 cb 01 00 00 48 8b 0b 89 c0 4c 8d 24 c1 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e1 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 94 01 00 00 48 8d 7b 10 4d 8b 3c 24 48 b8 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffff88809f82f7b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff8880a45c7030 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 1ffff110148b8e06 RDI: ffff8880a45c703c
RBP: ffff88809f82f7e8 R08: ffff888087aea200 R09: fffffbfff134ae50
R10: fffffbfff134ae4f R11: ffffffff89a5727f R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8880a45c6ac0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007fa04716f700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa04716edb8 CR3: 0000000091eb4000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 packet_current_frame net/packet/af_packet.c:487 [inline]
 tpacket_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:2667 [inline]
 packet_sendmsg+0x590/0x6250 net/packet/af_packet.c:2975
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:637 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0xd7/0x130 net/socket.c:657
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x3e2/0x920 net/socket.c:2311
 __sys_sendmmsg+0x1bf/0x4d0 net/socket.c:2413
 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2442 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2439 [inline]
 __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x9d/0x100 net/socket.c:2439
 do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x6a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Fixes: 69e3c75 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant