-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release v0.5.30 #2393
Release v0.5.30 #2393
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Looks like we can rebase on top of master since #2390 is now merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added 2 comments. Other than that, LGTM 👍
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
- [#2309](https://github.com/livepeer/go-livepeer/pull/2309) Add dynamic timeout for the orchestrator discovery (@leszko) | ||
- [#2337](https://github.com/livepeer/go-livepeer/pull/2337) Fix dynamic discovery timeout to not retry sending requests, but wait for the same request to complete (@leszko) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know we always have one bullet point per PR, but looking at it from the user perspective, the following 3 PRs provides one functionality: "Add dynamic timeout for the orchestrator discovery":
- discovery: Add dynamic timeout for the orchestrator discovery #2309 => The actual PR introducing a feature
- Fix dynamic discovery timeout to not retry sending requests, but wait for the same request to complete #2337 => Fix for the PR above
- discovery: Increase orchestrator discovery timeout from 500ms to 1s #2296 => Attempt before the above was implemented
It's not strictly related to this release, but I think we can consider creating a changelog which is more user facing and less PR-driven.
Saying that, we can keep it as it is for this release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, I've kept the first one and removed the other two
Co-authored-by: Rafał Leszko <rafal@livepeer.org>
What does this pull request do? Explain your changes. (required)
Version bump to v0.5.30.
Specific updates (required)
See commit history.
How did you test each of these updates (required)
Does this pull request close any open issues?
Checklist:
make
runs successfully./test.sh
pass