Include onchain transactions in events #448
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Here, we move updating fields via `PaymentDetailsUpdate` to `PaymentDetails::update`. This allows us to only update the fields that changed, keeping track *whether* something changed, and only updating the timestamp and persisting the entry *if* something changed. This is a nice improvement in general (as we want to reduce persist calls anyways), but we'll also use this for batch updates in the next commits.
We implement a batch updating method that will only persist entries that have been changed.
Previously, `PaymentKind::Onchain` was simply a placeholder entry we never actually used. Here, we extend it to include fields that are actually useful.
We update the payment store whenever syncing the wallet state finished.
…events .. two new events that we're emitting when we sent or received an onchain payment, i.e., the transactions reached ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #446.
Based on #432.
In #432 we exposed transactions in store. Here we take a stab at exposing them via events. However, to avoid emitting duplicate events for channel-related transactions, this is in draft until we have lightningdevkit/rust-lightning#3548