-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 494
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
04-onion-routing.md: Fix factual error about final_expiry_too_soon
.
#722
04-onion-routing.md: Fix factual error about final_expiry_too_soon
.
#722
Conversation
As reading of commit 6729755 shows, `final_expiry_too_soon` was 17, not PERM|17. Note that because we folded a previously non-permanent failure into the now-permanent PERM|15 failure code, modifications to payment algorithms may now be needed to specificalyl detect this case, otherwise payment algorithms may give up in some edge cases where blocks are mined while payments are in-transit between sender and receiver.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 74817af
What needs to be done to get this merged? |
An ack from someone from Lightning Labs, maybe @joostjager who touched this part of the spec recently? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🍁
…lightning#722) As reading of commit 6729755 shows, `final_expiry_too_soon` was 17, not PERM|17. Note that because we folded a previously non-permanent failure into the now-permanent PERM|15 failure code, modifications to payment algorithms may now be needed to specificalyl detect this case, otherwise payment algorithms may give up in some edge cases where blocks are mined while payments are in-transit between sender and receiver.
…lightning#722) As reading of commit 6729755 shows, `final_expiry_too_soon` was 17, not PERM|17. Note that because we folded a previously non-permanent failure into the now-permanent PERM|15 failure code, modifications to payment algorithms may now be needed to specificalyl detect this case, otherwise payment algorithms may give up in some edge cases where blocks are mined while payments are in-transit between sender and receiver.
As reading of commit 6729755 shows,
final_expiry_too_soon
was17, not PERM|17.
Note that because we folded a previously non-permanent failure into
the now-permanent PERM|15 failure code, modifications to payment
algorithms may now be needed to specificalyl detect this case,
otherwise payment algorithms may give up in some edge cases where
blocks are mined while payments are in-transit between sender and
receiver.