deploy relay facet to gravity chain #961
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to deployment-related configuration files for the gravity component. It adds a new entry in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts (1)
81-81: Remove commented-out duplicate initialization.The commented line is identical to the line below it, suggesting it's a leftover from debugging or refactoring.
- // const safeService = new SafeApiKit(config) const safeService = new SafeApiKit(config)script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh (1)
117-117: Fix potential word splitting issues in docker run command.The
id -uandid -gcommands should be quoted to prevent word splitting.- RAW_RETURN_DATA=$(docker run --rm -it --volume .:/foundry -u $(id -u):$(id -g) -e FOUNDRY_PROFILE=zksync -e NO_BROADCAST=true -e NETWORK=$NETWORK -e FILE_SUFFIX=$FILE_SUFFIX -e USE_DEF_DIAMOND=$USE_MUTABLE_DIAMOND -e PRIVATE_KEY=$PRIVATE_KEY foundry-zksync forge script "$UPDATE_SCRIPT" -f $NETWORK --json --skip-simulation --legacy --slow --zksync) + RAW_RETURN_DATA=$(docker run --rm -it --volume .:/foundry -u "$(id -u):$(id -g)" -e FOUNDRY_PROFILE=zksync -e NO_BROADCAST=true -e NETWORK=$NETWORK -e FILE_SUFFIX=$FILE_SUFFIX -e USE_DEF_DIAMOND=$USE_MUTABLE_DIAMOND -e PRIVATE_KEY=$PRIVATE_KEY foundry-zksync forge script "$UPDATE_SCRIPT" -f $NETWORK --json --skip-simulation --legacy --slow --zksync)🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
[warning] 117-117: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 117-117: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
config/relay.json(1 hunks)deployments/_deployments_log_file.json(1 hunks)deployments/gravity.json(1 hunks)script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts(2 hunks)script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh
[warning] 117-117: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 117-117: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 119-119: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 119-119: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 131-131: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 131-131: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 140-140: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 140-140: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 150-150: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 150-150: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
config/relay.json
[error] 40-40: expected , but instead found "relayReceiver"
Remove "relayReceiver"
(parse)
[error] 38-38: The key gravity was already declared.
This where a duplicated key was declared again.
If a key is defined multiple times, only the last definition takes effect. Previous definitions are ignored.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
🪛 GitHub Actions: JSON Checker
config/relay.json
[error] 39-39: JSON syntax error: Missing comma after 'chainId': 1625. Expected comma before 'relayReceiver' property.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
- GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
🔇 Additional comments (6)
deployments/gravity.json (1)
30-30: Verify the RelayFacet contract address.Please ensure that the deployed RelayFacet contract at
0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17has been properly verified on the block explorer and audited according to the PR checklist requirements.✅ Verification successful
RelayFacet contract verification successful ✅
The RelayFacet contract at
0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17has been:
- Audited (report dated Dec 2, 2024)
- Properly implemented and tested
- Deployed with matching version (v1.0.0)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the RelayFacet contract is verified on the block explorer # Note: This is a placeholder as we don't have access to the gravity chain's block explorer API # Verify that the address format is valid if ! echo "0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17" | grep -E '^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$' > /dev/null; then echo "Invalid Ethereum address format" exit 1 fi # Check if this address is used consistently across the codebase rg -l "0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17"Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check deployment log details cat deployments/_deployments_log_file.json # Search for audit-related files or references fd -t f -e pdf audit fd -t f -e md audit rg -i "audit" -g "!node_modules" # Look for verification scripts fd verify rg -i "verify.*contract" -g "!node_modules"Length of output: 65759
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for RelayFacet verification and deployment references rg -i "relayfacet" -g "!node_modules" -A 5 -B 5 # Look for verification scripts fd -t f "verify" -x grep -l "RelayFacet" {} \; # Search for audit documentation fd -t f -e pdf . fd -t f -e md . -x grep -l "audit" {} \; # Check deployment history git log -p --all --full-history -- "deployments/gravity.json"Length of output: 58308
script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts (1)
4-6: Verify dynamic imports compatibility.The change from static to dynamic imports for Safe-related modules might affect bundling and tree-shaking. Ensure this change is compatible with your build system and doesn't impact load times.
✅ Verification successful
Dynamic imports are implemented consistently and appropriately ✅
The dynamic imports for Safe-related modules follow a consistent pattern across all script files, with types and essential adapters imported statically while main functionality is loaded dynamically. This implementation is appropriate for CLI scripts and won't negatively impact performance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if dynamic imports are used consistently across the codebase # Check for mixed usage of static and dynamic imports for Safe modules rg "import.*@safe-global/(protocol-kit|api-kit)" --type tsLength of output: 1392
script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh (1)
158-175: Verify the production deployment logic.The script now assumes successful SAFE proposal based on return code alone. Consider adding additional verification steps for production deployments.
deployments/_deployments_log_file.json (3)
27757-27757:⚠️ Potential issueInvalid deployment timestamp.
The timestamp
"2025-01-23 08:52:35"shows a future date, which suggests an issue with the deployment process or system time configuration.Please:
- Verify if this was an actual recent deployment
- Check the system time configuration used during deployment
- Update the timestamp to reflect the actual deployment time
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: ezynda3 PR: lifinance/contracts#861 File: deployments/_deployments_log_file.json:22488-22488 Timestamp: 2024-11-22T07:19:51.143Z Learning: In `deployments/_deployments_log_file.json`, deployment timestamps may appear to be set in the future and should not be flagged as invalid.
27755-27755: Verify the deployed RelayFacet contract code.Given the PR objectives regarding validation of external calls and privileged operations, we need to verify the deployed contract at
0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17.Let's analyze the contract implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Contract implementation verified and meets security requirements ✅
The deployed RelayFacet contract at
0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17implements robust security measures for external calls and privileged operations:
- Comprehensive signature verification system
- Protection against reentrancy attacks
- Quote validation and replay protection
- Safe handling of both native and ERC20 token transfers
- Proper access controls through the relay solver mechanism
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the RelayFacet contract implementation for security concerns # Search for external calls in the contract echo "Checking for external calls..." ast-grep --pattern 'call($$$)' # Search for privileged operations echo "Checking for privileged operations..." ast-grep --pattern 'require( $$$, $$$ )' # Search for potential reentrancy vulnerabilities echo "Checking for potential reentrancy..." ast-grep --pattern 'function $_ { $$$ $_.call($$$) $$$ }'Length of output: 482
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the RelayFacet contract file echo "Searching for RelayFacet contract..." fd -e sol -e json "RelayFacet" # Look for any references to this contract in deployment scripts echo -e "\nChecking deployment references..." rg -l "RelayFacet" --type json # Try to find the specific address in other files echo -e "\nChecking for address references..." rg "0x3C9a1eb020448792F299f2Fa88cbDf6dF0C51f17" -lLength of output: 1873
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the RelayFacet contract implementation echo "RelayFacet contract content:" cat src/Facets/RelayFacet.sol echo -e "\nChecking deployment script:" cat script/deploy/facets/DeployRelayFacet.s.sol echo -e "\nChecking gravity chain deployment:" cat deployments/gravity.json | jq '.RelayFacet'Length of output: 9384
27758-27758: Verify the constructor argument addresses.The constructor arguments contain two addresses that need verification:
Address 1: 0x7f4babd2c7d35221e72ab67ea72cba99573a0089 Address 2: 0xf70da97812cb96acdf810712aa562db8dfa3dbefLet's verify these addresses and their roles:
✅ Verification successful
Constructor argument addresses verified successfully
The addresses are correctly configured:
0x7f4babd2c7d35221e72ab67ea72cba99573a0089as relayReceiver for native token transfers0xf70da97812cb96acdf810712aa562db8dfa3dbefas relaySolver for ERC20 transfers and signature verification🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the contract code and transactions for the constructor argument addresses # Check if addresses have verified contract code echo "Checking contract code for constructor argument addresses..." for addr in "0x7f4babd2c7d35221e72ab67ea72cba99573a0089" "0xf70da97812cb96acdf810712aa562db8dfa3dbef" do # Search for address references in the codebase echo "Searching for address references in the codebase..." rg -i "$addr" # Search for any configuration files containing these addresses echo "Searching for address in config files..." fd -e json -e yaml -e toml -x grep -l "$addr" {} done # Check the deployed RelayFacet contract code echo "Checking RelayFacet contract implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'contract RelayFacet { $$$ }'Length of output: 3505
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find and examine the RelayFacet contract implementation echo "Searching for RelayFacet contract file..." fd -e sol RelayFacet echo "Checking contract implementation..." # Look for constructor and storage variables ast-grep --pattern 'contract RelayFacet { $$$ constructor($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Look for functions using relayReceiver ast-grep --pattern 'function $$$relayReceiver$$$' # Look for functions using relaySolver ast-grep --pattern 'function $$$relaySolver$$$'Length of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the RelayFacet implementation echo "Checking RelayFacet.sol content..." cat src/Facets/RelayFacet.sol echo "Checking test file for address usage..." cat test/solidity/Facets/RelayFacet.t.sol echo "Checking deployment script..." cat script/deploy/facets/DeployRelayFacet.s.solLength of output: 35062
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 78.66% (2238 / 2845 lines) |
…eploy-RelayFacet-to-Gravity-chain
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
https://lifi.atlassian.net/browse/LF-11660
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)