Update README.md

[NoritakaIkeda]

Issue

• resolve:

Why is this change needed?

What would you like reviewers to focus on?

Testing Verification

What was done

🤖 Generated by PR Agent at 9465100

• Added a sample line to the README file.
• Minor formatting changes in the README file.

Detailed Changes

	Relevant files
Documentation	README.md Added a sample line and formatting updates                              README.md Added a new line with the word sample. Included additional blank lines for formatting. +3/-0

Additional Notes

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9465100

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
liam-app	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 19, 2025 11:42am
liam-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 19, 2025 11:42am
liam-erd-sample	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 19, 2025 11:42am

3 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
test-liam-app	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Mar 19, 2025 11:42am
test-liam-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Mar 19, 2025 11:42am
test-liam-erd-sample	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Mar 19, 2025 11:42am

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No major issues detected

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[supabase]

Updates to Preview Branch (NoritakaIkeda-patch-4) ↗︎

Deployments	Status	Updated
Database	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:16 UTC
Services	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:16 UTC
APIs	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:16 UTC

Tasks are run on every commit but only new migration files are pushed.
Close and reopen this PR if you want to apply changes from existing seed or migration files.

Tasks	Status	Updated
Configurations	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:26 UTC
Migrations	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:28 UTC
Seeding	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:28 UTC
Edge Functions	✅	Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:56:28 UTC

---

View logs for this Workflow Run ↗︎.
Learn more about Supabase for Git ↗︎.

[liam-migration-preview]

The provided schema changes indicate a modification to the README.md file, which appears to be a documentation file rather than a database schema itself. The changes involve adding three lines, including a reference to contribution guidelines, a code of conduct, and an additional mention of a sample. While these changes may enhance the documentation and provide clearer guidance for contributors, they do not directly affect the database schema, tables, relationships, or any data structures.

From a documentation perspective, the updates seem beneficial as they point users to important resources that can improve their understanding of the project and ensure adherence to community standards. However, there are several aspects to consider for a more comprehensive review:

1. Clarity and Context: While adding references to contribution guidelines and the code of conduct is valuable, it would be beneficial to provide a brief explanation or context about what contributors can expect when they read these documents. This can help set the tone and expectations for collaboration.

2. Sample Information: The addition of the term "sample" at the end of the changes is vague and lacks context. It would be more effective if it were elaborated upon. For example, what kind of sample is being referenced? Is it a sample database schema, sample data, or something else? Providing a clear description would enhance clarity.

3. Integration with Schema Changes: If there were intended schema changes related to the database, these should be documented in a more structured manner, possibly in a dedicated section or file that outlines the changes to tables, fields, relationships, and any migrations that may be necessary. Including such details would allow users and developers to understand how the schema evolves over time.

4. Versioning and Change Log: It would be beneficial to incorporate a change log or versioning system within the documentation to track changes to the database schema and related resources. This would help users quickly identify what has changed in each version and the implications of those changes.

In summary, while the modifications to the README.md file serve to enhance documentation and provide necessary resources for contributors, they do not constitute direct changes to the database schema. Adding more context to the new entries and clearly defining what "sample" refers to would improve the clarity and usefulness of the documentation. Furthermore, ensuring that database schema changes are documented in an organized manner will help maintain the integrity of the database design and facilitate better collaboration among developers.

Migration URL: https://liam-app-git-staging-route-06-core.vercel.app/app/projects/4/migrations/3