Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring of tag handling with correct YAML syntax #1895

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

horecoli
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This change modifies the points.yml file to use correct YAML syntax for a list.
It also includes the simplification of tag handling.

Issues:

Refs: #1865

How has this been tested:

Tested by running all tests (workload and platform) and all spec tests.

Types of changes:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

Documentation

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • No updates required.

Code Review

  • Does the test handle fatal exceptions, ie. rescue block

Issue

  • Tasks in issue are checked off

This change modifies the points.yml file to use correct
YAML syntax for a list.
It also includes the simplification of tag handling.

Closes-Bug: lfn-cnti#1865
Signed-off-by: horecoli <oliver.horecny@tietoevry.com>
@HashNuke
Copy link
Collaborator

Found an issue with the changes in this PR. It causes build failures.
Fixed it in my branch as a part of merging other PRs.

CleanShot 2024-02-20 at 21 05 03@2x

CleanShot 2024-02-20 at 21 03 57@2x

@agentpoyo agentpoyo merged commit 10125ae into lfn-cnti:main Feb 26, 2024
12 of 95 checks passed
@horecoli horecoli deleted the tags_in_points_yaml branch February 27, 2024 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants