Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: GROW-1241-health-command-single-provider-arg #1475

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mikecot
Copy link
Collaborator

@mikecot mikecot commented Jun 4, 2024

GROW-1241-health-command-single-provider-arg

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced health monitoring functionality with new parameters for better control and flexibility.
    • Added new flags to allow single provider address handling and configurable post results settings.
    • Introduced new fields to capture results GUID and provider addresses.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 4, 2024

Test Results

2 173 tests   - 8   2 173 ✅  - 8   24m 17s ⏱️ -39s
  145 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
    7 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 20b8552. ± Comparison against base commit 802730b.

This pull request removes 2181 and adds 2173 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_1
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_1.2
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_2
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_2.5
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_200
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_No_Hash
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_No_Hash#01
github.com/lavanet/lava/v2/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_With_Hash
…
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_1
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_1.2
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_2
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_2.5
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheExpirationMultiplier/Multiplier_of_200
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_No_Hash
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_No_Hash#01
github.com/lavanet/lava/v3/ecosystem/cache ‑ TestCacheFailSetWithInvalidRequestBlock/Finalized_After_delay_With_Hash
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

omerlavanet
omerlavanet previously approved these changes Jun 11, 2024
@Yaroms Yaroms changed the title GROW-1241-health-command-single-provider-arg feat: GROW-1241-health-command-single-provider-arg Jun 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the health monitoring functionality through additional parameters and processing logic. Specifically, new fields and flags support more granular control of provider data processing, a unique identifier for post results, and a one-time health check option. Adjustments were also made to existing methods to utilize these enhancements effectively.

Changes

Files Change Summary
protocol/monitoring/alerting.go Modified ProvidersAlerts to calculate timeGap using a retrieved specHealthResult.
protocol/monitoring/health.go Enhanced RunHealth function with parameters resultsPostGUID and singleProviderSpecsInterfacesData, altering the processing flow for provider data.
protocol/monitoring/health_cmd.go Added new flags (resultsPostGUIDFlagName, resultsPostSkipSpecFlagName, singleProviderAddressFlagName, singleProviderSpecsInterfacesDataFlagName, runOnceAndExitFlagName).
protocol/monitoring/health_results.go Introduced fields ResultsPostGUID and ProviderAddresses to the HealthResults struct.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant HealthService
    participant DB

    User->>CLI: Run health command
    CLI->>HealthService: Invoke RunHealth
    HealthService->>DB: Fetch single provider specs/interfaces
    DB-->>HealthService: Return data
    HealthService->>HealthService: Process health data, set ResultsPostGUID
    HealthService-->>CLI: Return HealthResults
    CLI-->>User: Display results
Loading

Poem

In the world of codes and specs,
Our health checks now perfect,
With resultsPostGUID in the mix,
And provider data, quick to fix.
One run, then exit, sweet and neat,
🎉 Our monitors, now complete! 🚀


Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for code reviews and chat: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17c497d and d984bf4.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • protocol/monitoring/alerting.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/monitoring/health.go (9 hunks)
  • protocol/monitoring/health_cmd.go (5 hunks)
  • protocol/monitoring/health_results.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
protocol/monitoring/health_results.go (1)

21-22: The new fields ResultsPostGUID and ProviderAddresses are added to enhance the tracking of health checks across providers and to identify results uniquely. Ensure that all parts of the system that consume HealthResults are updated to handle these new fields.

protocol/monitoring/health_cmd.go (1)

Line range hint 150-179: The addition of flags for controlling single provider details and running the health command once is a significant improvement for targeted health checks and automation scenarios. Ensure that the documentation is updated to reflect these new flags and their usage.

Also applies to: 286-298

protocol/monitoring/alerting.go (1)

360-364: The modification to use specHealthResult for time gap calculation in ProvidersAlerts method improves the precision of alert conditions. This is crucial for accurate monitoring and alerting. Ensure that the error handling for missing specId is robust and tested.

protocol/monitoring/health.go (3)

81-82: Added parameters resultsPostGUID and singleProviderSpecsInterfacesData to the RunHealth function signature to support detailed health monitoring and selective processing.


94-95: New fields ResultsPostGUID and ProviderAddresses added to HealthResults struct to support the new parameters in RunHealth.


135-148: Logic to handle singleProviderSpecsInterfacesData by converting spec IDs to uppercase and trimming spaces. This code ensures the input is sanitized and standardized before use.

protocol/monitoring/health.go Show resolved Hide resolved
protocol/monitoring/health.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d984bf4 and 8871189.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • protocol/monitoring/health.go (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • protocol/monitoring/health.go

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8871189 and 688e89e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • protocol/monitoring/health.go (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • protocol/monitoring/health.go

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants