Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update license key troubleshooting #3157

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

hinthornw
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hinthornw hinthornw force-pushed the wfh/docs_updates branch 2 times, most recently from 8e5b48b to 000f585 Compare January 22, 2025 23:57
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ For more information, please see:

The LangGraph Platform Deployments view (within LangSmith SaaS and self-hosted LangSmith) is not available for Self-Hosted Lite LangGraph deployments. Self-hosted LangGraph deployments are managed externally from LangSmith (e.g. there is no UI to manage these deployments).

The Self-Hosted Lite deployment option is a free (up to 1 million nodes executed), limited version of LangGraph Platform that you can run locally or in a self-hosted manner.
The Self-Hosted Lite deployment option is a free (up to 1 million nodes executed per annum), limited version of LangGraph Platform that you can run locally or in a self-hosted manner.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have foreign speakers

per annum -> per year

Errors referenced below will have an `lc_error_code` property corresponding to one of the below codes when they are thrown in code.

- [GRAPH_RECURSION_LIMIT](./GRAPH_RECURSION_LIMIT.md)
- [INVALID_CONCURRENT_GRAPH_UPDATE](./INVALID_CONCURRENT_GRAPH_UPDATE.md)
- [INVALID_GRAPH_NODE_RETURN_VALUE](./INVALID_GRAPH_NODE_RETURN_VALUE.md)
- [MULTIPLE_SUBGRAPHS](./MULTIPLE_SUBGRAPHS.md)
- [INVALID_CHAT_HISTORY](./INVALID_CHAT_HISTORY.md)

## LangGraph Platform
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need to create a separate section for this a single bullet point list is fine for now -- there are so few of them. and users don't know apriori if something is langgraph platform or langgraph in some cases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants