This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
Use convention in position gradients sample labels #7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PicoCentauri
force-pushed
the
fix_convert_positions
branch
from
b081802 to
ed0549b
Compare
DavideTisi
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As @Luthaf already pointed out in a comment in #3: The convention for the position gradients sample labels is a bit different as we defined it here. This PR changes the
properties_to_tensormapfunctiom to use the same convention.