-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SKR binding test #1184
Add SKR binding test #1184
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
Add one of following labels |
/kind enhancement |
c7529ee
to
cc0e2fd
Compare
}); | ||
|
||
it('Initiate K8s client with kubeconfig from binding', async function() { | ||
await initializeK8sClient({kubeconfig: kubeconfigFromBinding.credentials}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please add an assertion that where you cannot access cluster before initialization is done? I am afraid that it might swallow errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will change it to not provision and init in the first step.
/hold |
@@ -126,6 +126,31 @@ The test executes the following steps: | |||
make skr-networking-test | |||
``` | |||
|
|||
## Binding Tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder whether it should be service binding
here and in line 135? If just binding
is sufficient, please ignore this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will leave it as it is. It's documentation for the tests, so I think that's sufficient.
28ae0fe
to
0fea4dd
Compare
/unhold |
dc761cf
Description
Add a test with the following steps:
Related issue(s)
See #284