Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

component test for istio based jwt apirule creation #149

Closed
7 tasks done
strekm opened this issue Dec 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
7 tasks done

component test for istio based jwt apirule creation #149

strekm opened this issue Dec 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@strekm
Copy link
Contributor

strekm commented Dec 28, 2022

Description

Implement component test exposing httpbin with istio jwt apirule. Assuming cluster is created, kyma installed (only Istio is required) api-gateway controller is installed with FT on test should deploy httpbin workload and add it to service mesh. APIRule should be created with all possible fields (consider required scopes) and then httpbin endpoint called.

ACs:

  • test deploys httpbin workload as a part of service mesh
  • test creates apirule of type istio jwt with all possible fields
  • test calles exposed endpoint
  • test should be gherkinized

Reasons

automatisation of testing effort

DoD:
- [ ] provide documentation
- [ ] publish release notes and What's New updates for Kyma customers
- [ ] provide unit tests

  • test on SKR
    - [ ] verify Get started guides
    - [ ] verify resource limits
  • followup issue
    - [ ] create release and bump in kyma

PR

Attachments

@kyma-bot
Copy link
Contributor

kyma-bot commented Apr 4, 2023

This issue or PR has been automatically marked as stale due to the lack of recent activity.
Thank you for your contributions.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 60d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 7d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue or PR with /close

If you think that I work incorrectly, kindly raise an issue with the problem.

/lifecycle stale

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants