Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added test cases for backend module for serialisation #11

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

monil
Copy link

@monil monil commented Oct 2, 2020

Added test cases for sheilddb-gson-backend component covering following

  1. Constructors
  2. List to json

@monil monil changed the title Added test cases for backend module for serilazation and deserialzation Added test cases for backend module for serialisation Oct 2, 2020
<groupId>org.hamcrest</groupId>
<artifactId>hamcrest</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you rebase your branch on master, these dependencies was already added





Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you remove these useless blank lines?

List<User> user = shieldDBGson.toList("[{\"name\":\"shieldDB\"}]");

assertEquals(1,user.size());

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you remove this useless blank line?


assertEquals("[{\"name\":\"shieldDB\"}]",shieldDBGson.toJson
(Arrays.asList(new User("shieldDB"))));

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you remove this useless blank line?

@kuroidoruido kuroidoruido added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Oct 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants