Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update controller-gen #996

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator

What this PR does / why we need it:
The old version, v0.10.0, failed to run when compiled using golang 1.22. That broke compilation of SSP operator.

This PR updates the version to v0.14.0 which is not the latest, because the latest required golang 1.22. We still want to be able to compile SSP using golang 1.21.

Release note:

None

The old version, v0.10.0, failed to run when compiled using
golang 1.22. That broke compilation of SSP operator.

This commit updates the version to v0.14.0 which is not the
latest, because the latest required golang 1.22. We still
want to be able to compile SSP using golang 1.21.

Signed-off-by: Andrej Krejcir <akrejcir@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Jun 17, 2024
@akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/cc @0xFelix @ksimon1 @jcanocan

@jcanocan
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2024
documentation for more details: \n remote targets https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kustomize/blob/master/examples/remoteBuild.md"
description: |-
URL of a remote Kustomize target from which to generate and deploy resources.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This adds a lot of unneccessary newlines, can it be avoided?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@akrejcir akrejcir Jun 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure how. Maybe there is a config option in the controller-gen. I will check.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, there isn't any parameter.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe a bug in controller-gen?

@akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@akrejcir
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@0xFelix 0xFelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 0xFelix

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 19, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 2e0dbca into kubevirt:main Jun 19, 2024
12 checks passed
@akrejcir akrejcir deleted the update-controller-gen branch June 20, 2024 06:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants