Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow up of tests/go.mod #2989

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

@nunnatsa nunnatsa commented Jun 9, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR follows up PR #2988, fixing and improving small things:

  1. removed the unused tests/.golangci.yml file.
    This is no longer needed because the tests/ dir is no longer a separate go module, but part of the whole project.
  2. Remove object type from KubeVirt objects:
    This is no longer needed, after bumping kubevirt api package, when start using the project's go.mod file in the functional tests.
  3. Bump ginkgo to v2.19.0

Release note:

None

@nunnatsa nunnatsa requested a review from tiraboschi June 9, 2024 12:36
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Jun 9, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot requested a review from orenc1 June 9, 2024 12:37
@nunnatsa nunnatsa force-pushed the rm-tests-gomod-continue branch 2 times, most recently from 7a5a5d4 to 303c263 Compare June 9, 2024 15:05
@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nunnatsa commented Jun 9, 2024

/test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure
/test hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test build-hco-test-utils-image
  • /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.29
  • /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.30

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.29
  • pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.30

In response to this:

/test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure
/test hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/override-bot

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test build-hco-test-utils-image
  • /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.29
  • /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.30

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.29
  • pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.30

In response to this:

/test hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nunnatsa nunnatsa force-pushed the rm-tests-gomod-continue branch from 303c263 to f2336de Compare June 10, 2024 08:48
@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test build-hco-test-utils-image
  • /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.29
  • /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.30

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.29
  • pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.30

In response to this:

/test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 10, 2024
@nunnatsa nunnatsa force-pushed the rm-tests-gomod-continue branch from f2336de to c060059 Compare June 10, 2024 13:06
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 10, 2024
@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 10, 2024

hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lanes succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nunnatsa nunnatsa force-pushed the rm-tests-gomod-continue branch from eee6ce4 to e9f808e Compare June 11, 2024 10:26
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.9% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Jun 11, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9463900203

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 85.792%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
controllers/operands/operandHandler.go 1 86.18%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9462344600: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Jun 11, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9445328492

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 11, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/retest

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9448910932

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.792%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9447923760: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9448910932

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.792%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9447923760: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9448910932

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.792%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9447923760: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9436602304

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9436602304

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9436602304

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9436898996

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9436898996

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9436898996

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 85.809%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5200
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 11, 2024

@nunnatsa: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws e9f808e link false /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws
ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp e9f808e link true /test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp
ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure e9f808e link true /test hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure e9f808e link true /test hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Jun 11, 2024

hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2024
@tiraboschi
Copy link
Member

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tiraboschi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 11, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit 39261af into kubevirt:main Jun 11, 2024
31 checks passed
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9437503740

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 85.792%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
controllers/operands/operandHandler.go 1 86.18%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9437503740

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 85.792%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
controllers/operands/operandHandler.go 1 86.18%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9437503740

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 85.792%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
controllers/operands/operandHandler.go 1 86.18%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9418562732: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 5199
Relevant Lines: 6060

💛 - Coveralls

@nunnatsa nunnatsa deleted the rm-tests-gomod-continue branch June 11, 2024 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants