Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix migration of OVA to WFFC storage classes #966

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ahadas
Copy link
Member

@ahadas ahadas commented Jul 23, 2024

In a2170ea we've added the following logic: when using storage classes that are set with WaitForFirstConsumer in migrations from vSphere, we treat the PendingPopulation status as Succeeded since the conversion pod would be the first consumer of the PVCs. This PR applies the same logic also to migrations from OVA providers.

In a2170ea we've added the following logic: when using storage classes
that are set with WaitForFirstConsumer in migrations from vSphere, we
treat the PendingPopulation status as Succeeded since the conversion pod
would be the first consumer of the PVCs. This PR applies the same logic
also to migrations from OVA providers.

Signed-off-by: Arik Hadas <ahadas@redhat.com>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.26%. Comparing base (ce94417) to head (766f1dc).

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/controller/plan/migration.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #966   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   16.26%   16.26%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       19386    19386           
=======================================
  Hits         3153     3153           
  Misses      15954    15954           
  Partials      279      279           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 16.26% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ahadas ahadas merged commit d41fad0 into kubev2v:main Jul 23, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@ahadas ahadas deleted the ova_wffc branch July 23, 2024 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants