Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable using built binaries on the kubetest2 gce conformance job. #21030

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2021

Conversation

amwat
Copy link
Contributor

@amwat amwat commented Feb 25, 2021

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 25, 2021
@@ -92,4 +92,5 @@ periodics:
--down \;
--test=ginkgo \;
-- \;
--focus-regex='\[Conformance\]'
--focus-regex='\[Conformance\]';
--use-built-binaries
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO once this is validated this should actually be the default unless test binaries have not been built.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, yeah i didn't change it in the initial PR since that would break the current default.

Copy link
Member

@BenTheElder BenTheElder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config label Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: amwat, BenTheElder

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/jobs area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8e1010c into kubernetes:master Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Feb 25, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@amwat: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster test-infra-trusted using the following files:

  • key gce-conformance.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-cloud-provider/gcp/gce-conformance.yaml

In response to this:

follow up to : kubernetes-sigs/kubetest2#95

xref: kubernetes/enhancements#2464

/cc @BenTheElder @spiffxp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@amwat amwat deleted the ginkgo-source branch February 25, 2021 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants