Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add a waiting logic for webhook flake UT #100073

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

add a waiting logic for webhook flake UT #100073

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pacoxu
Copy link
Member

@pacoxu pacoxu commented Mar 10, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:

A flake fix try.

This should not be the best fix in my mind.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #100070

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/apiserver sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pacoxu
To complete the pull request process, please assign smarterclayton after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @smarterclayton in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pacoxu pacoxu marked this pull request as draft March 10, 2021 10:12
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pacoxu: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel ab8c767 link /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind ab8c767 link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member Author

pacoxu commented Mar 10, 2021

/test pull-kubernetes-unit

@pacoxu pacoxu closed this Mar 12, 2021
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 16, 2021
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Mar 16, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fedebongio: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fedebongio: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@pacoxu pacoxu deleted the paco-second-issues branch June 23, 2021 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@caesarxuchao caesarxuchao Awaiting requested review from caesarxuchao

@enj enj Awaiting requested review from enj

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/apiserver cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Flaky] k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/admission/plugin/webhook/validating TestValidate
3 participants
@pacoxu @k8s-ci-robot @fedebongio