Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Take inventory of Google-owned GCP projects for k8s-infra #241

Closed
spiffxp opened this issue Apr 30, 2019 · 11 comments
Closed

Take inventory of Google-owned GCP projects for k8s-infra #241

spiffxp opened this issue Apr 30, 2019 · 11 comments
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Milestone
migrate-low-risk

Comments

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Apr 30, 2019

Google has GCP projects for k8s-infra that hold more than just Kubernetes clusters and the pods/services therein. To better identify which services need to be migrated over, let's inventory which projects are currently used to run k8s-infra (or tests for k8s) and the services that they use

eg:

  • k8s-prow
  • k8s-prow-builds
  • k8s-mungegithub
  • k8s-gubernator
  • kubernetes-jenkins
  • kubernetes-jenkins-pull
  • kubernetes-site
  • (the sundry projects used by boskos)
  • etc.
@spiffxp spiffxp added this to the migrate-low-risk milestone Apr 30, 2019
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Jun 4, 2019 •
edited
Loading

How can I give some help on this one ?

@parispittman
Copy link
Contributor

wanted to document google analytics somewhere for kubernetes.io - unsure if this has been transferred or status but now we have it documented to check :)

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jun 15, 2019

@parispittman Thanks! good one. Who uses the analytics most? (sig-docs?)

@parispittman
Copy link
Contributor

@dims - correct. i believe all major players on the team have access (including non-googlers) but it may be still a google owned account.

@thockin thockin added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Jul 8, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 6, 2019
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Oct 6, 2019

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 6, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 4, 2020
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Jan 5, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 5, 2020
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Mar 25, 2020

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Mar 25, 2020
@spiffxp spiffxp mentioned this issue Apr 23, 2020
Closed
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member Author

spiffxp commented Dec 8, 2020

/close
Closing this in favor of #1469

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@spiffxp: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close
Closing this in favor of #1469

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
migrate-low-risk
Development

No branches or pull requests
7 participants
@dims @spiffxp @ameukam @thockin @parispittman @k8s-ci-robot @fejta-bot