Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we add mitogen support back. #8414

Closed
cristicalin opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

Should we add mitogen support back. #8414

cristicalin opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 9 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@cristicalin
Copy link
Contributor

With mitogen releasing https://github.com/mitogen-hq/mitogen/releases/tag/v0.3.1 I would like to probe interest from the community on reinstating full support including CI coverage.

As pointed out in #8147 (comment) I think one new minor release does not quite signal that the project is back in active development but I think the community should describe their use-cases and vote on if this feature is worth maintainer and CI time on behalf of the kubespray project.

@cristicalin cristicalin added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jan 12, 2022
@maxpain
Copy link
Contributor

maxpain commented Jan 12, 2022

In our case, upgrade-cluster.yml on a cluster with 2 nodes without mitogen takes 1 hour 20 minutes.
With mitogen about 15 minutes.

The difference is noticeable when you have high latency between ansible host and target nodes, in my case I have latency 270ms (from Russia, Moscow to Buenos Aires, Argentina).

Another case is with a cluster in the same region where I am (latency about 5 ms): cluster.yml (installing k8s from scratch) takes about 5 minutes with mitogen and 15 minutes without.

@fungusakafungus
Copy link
Contributor

In our case, mitogen makes our parallel upgrades slow: #8125

@Tristan971
Copy link
Contributor

Same effects as @maxpain here with high-latency.

Some of our playbooks (incl Kubespray) are an order of magnitude faster with mitogen vs without, so it's a bit difficult to not want it to be first-class.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 1, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 1, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Tristan971
Copy link
Contributor

/reopen

While not necessarily incredibly active, the project is seeing activity, merges and fixes.

Also Ansible 6 support was just merged a week ago, which at least addresses the original main driver of its deprecation in #8147.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Tristan971: You can't reopen an issue/PR unless you authored it or you are a collaborator.

In response to this:

/reopen

While not necessarily incredibly active, the project is seeing activity, merges and fixes.

Also Ansible 6 support was just merged a week ago, which at least addresses the original main driver of its deprecation in #8147.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants