Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Revert (kustomize/v2): fix ServiceMonitor with TLS kustomize scaffolding #4556

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Feb 10, 2025

Reverts #4536

Those changes broke the project: Example: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/actions/runs/13250335077/job/36986568474?pr=4555

It is strange but seems that the tests were not executed and the PR merged without them

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 10, 2025
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

camilamacedo86 commented Feb 10, 2025

Hi @ashishranjan738

Sorry, I do not understand how it gets merged without passing in the CI.
I will need to validate the config. But those changes broke the e2e tests, see: #4555

Example: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/actions/runs/13250335077/job/36986568474?pr=4555

I could validate that by reverting all returns to work,
So, we will need to revert and the properly fix the issue.

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title Revert ":bug: (kustomize/v2): fix ServiceMonitor with TLS kustomize scaffolding" 🌱 Revert ":bug: (kustomize/v2): fix ServiceMonitor with TLS kustomize scaffolding" Feb 10, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 🌱 Revert ":bug: (kustomize/v2): fix ServiceMonitor with TLS kustomize scaffolding" 🌱 Revert (kustomize/v2): fix ServiceMonitor with TLS kustomize scaffolding Feb 10, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1c98e2c into master Feb 10, 2025
48 of 51 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants