-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
📖 add docs/examples for pre-release and nightly img version deployments with clusterctl #9797
📖 add docs/examples for pre-release and nightly img version deployments with clusterctl #9797
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
a7135e1
to
92017d6
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 7735f31aa1ef11f138cd034298f161f2e68af273
|
|
||
<aside class="note warning"> | ||
|
||
<h1> Deploying nightly release images </h1> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for writing this up!
Can you please try if it's possible to overwrite only the URL for the providers instead of the images (see: #9604 (comment))
This way we would also get the latest manifests if I understand it correctly
(also gave a pointer on how to use core CAPI nightly images for provider e2e tests there)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👋 @sbueringer have not gotten any traction on the linked issue re adding googlestorage repo support
wdyt if i update this current PR to remove the example for overwriting the image tag and simplify the doc update to mention the location of the nightly release YAMLs.
i will also create a follow up issue to address Add support for consuming nightly release manifests in clusterctl
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pushed up some changes here when you have a chance to take another pass
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thx!
92017d6
to
af2a49b
Compare
Thank you! /lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 0e3392a14d834537a73217436416c9d67f17f71f
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #9604
/area release