Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Add loggercheck linter and fix findings #9446

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 18, 2023
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ linters:
- govet
- importas
- ineffassign
- loggercheck
Copy link
Member Author

@sbueringer sbueringer Sep 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Validates for complete k/v pairs (i.e. we get a finding if we have an odd number of arguments)

Example

test/infrastructure/docker/internal/docker/manager.go:175:46: odd number of arguments passed as key-value pairs for logging (loggercheck)
        log.V(6).Info("Container run options: %+v", runOptions)
                                                    ^

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks really useful.
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d2ca99a23c158b1062e1edc906187e9463f6e74a

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/area ci

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/ci Issues or PRs related to ci and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Sep 18, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Yup especially (IIRC) because the logger panics when these cases are hit

Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: killianmuldoon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 90537d1 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.6 milestone Sep 18, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-add-loggercheck branch September 18, 2023 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/ci Issues or PRs related to ci cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants