-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚠️ Bump to controller-runtime v0.16 #8999
⚠️ Bump to controller-runtime v0.16 #8999
Conversation
1b7bc63
to
1d077d5
Compare
1d077d5
to
edab569
Compare
/test ? |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main |
edab569
to
b2d5abd
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main |
b2d5abd
to
300f9c8
Compare
300f9c8
to
303aa48
Compare
303aa48
to
4e6f582
Compare
4e6f582
to
9b91d92
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main Note to myself: sort of expecting an error because of: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime/pull/2439/files#diff-7e7ff90d22397cbc25370857a4c26baa1062866c5c9581e440d1e37603e45011 EDIT: Okay not really, we are never setting Continue to a non-empty string |
9b91d92
to
477b008
Compare
24e385b
to
db92690
Compare
aa983bf
to
c4c12fa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 5569e965f406b3046db1fab491c67c65ba34c88c
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
great work!
Nice to see how this bump went in smoothly
@@ -218,9 +220,12 @@ func main() { | |||
LeaderElectionResourceLock: resourcelock.LeasesResourceLock, | |||
HealthProbeBindAddress: healthAddr, | |||
PprofBindAddress: profilerAddress, | |||
Metrics: metricsserver.Options{ | |||
BindAddress: metricsBindAddr, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
q: as a follow-up, what about opening an issue for documenting how to get metrics in CAPI?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this PR nothing changes.
Authorized metrics will be part of this effort: #9264
I was planning to write a corresponding issue and bring it up in the office hours.
But just the CR bump itself in this PR doesn't change anything
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, killianmuldoon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
c4c12fa
to
932cdc4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: b97670474b499d8bae1575bdda6352f6bd575034
|
/hold cancel Given all the lgtm's above |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
What this PR does / why we need it:
I'll start verifying controller-runtime main on this PR.
Not really worth reviewing until we're closer to the Kubernetes / CR release (at some point towards end of August)
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Part of #8708