Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📖 Small improvements to the v1beta2 status proposal #11460

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • At Cluster level, split MachinesReady in ControlPlaneMachinesReady WorkerMachinesReady
  • At Cluster level, split MachinesUpToDate in ControlPlaneMachinesUpToDate WorkerMachinesUpToDate
  • Add RollingOut condition on Cluster, KCP, MD, MS
  • Update the control plane contract to include the RollingOut condition

/area conditions

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/conditions Issues or PRs related to conditions cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 21, 2024

Most notably, the Cluster controller is going to read `ScalingUp`, `ScalingDown` conditions, if existing, and use
them to compute a Cluster level `ScalingUp`, `ScalingDown` condition including all the scalable resources.
Most notably, If `RollingOut`, `ScalingUp`, `ScalingDown` conditions are implemented, the the Cluster controller is going to read
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Most notably, If `RollingOut`, `ScalingUp`, `ScalingDown` conditions are implemented, the the Cluster controller is going to read
Most notably, If `RollingOut`, `ScalingUp`, `ScalingDown` conditions are implemented, the Cluster controller is going to read

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the small-improvements-to-status-proposal branch from b087434 to e04e63e Compare November 21, 2024 15:29
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 045a4e6fa028df71afa22fd17a2856615bae11de

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 91b87fb into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 21, 2024
16 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.9 milestone Nov 21, 2024
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the small-improvements-to-status-proposal branch December 2, 2024 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/conditions Issues or PRs related to conditions cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants